Design and evaluation of voluntary opening and voluntary closing prosthetic terminal device.

Body-powered prostheses use a cable-operated system to generate forces and move prosthetic joints. However, this control system can only generate forces in one direction, so current body-powered prehensor designs allow the user either to voluntarily open or voluntarily close the tongs. Both voluntary opening (VO) and voluntary closing (VC) modes of operation have advantages for certain tasks, and many end-users desire a terminal device that can switch between the two modes. However, such a terminal device must maintain the same thumb position (i.e., point of Bowden cable attachment) and movement direction in both modes in order to avoid the need to readjust the harness after every mode switch. In this study, we demonstrate a simple design that fulfills these requirements while allowing the user to switch easily between modes. We describe the design concept, describe a rugged split-hook prototype, provide specifications (size, weight, efficiency, etc.), and present a pilot study in which five subjects with intact arms and two subjects with amputation used the VO and VC split-hook prehensor to perform the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure. Subjects performed an average of 4 to 7 (+/- 0.2) points better when they could choose to switch between modes on a task-by-task basis than when they were constrained to using only VO or VC modes.

[1]  Laura A. Miller,et al.  Summary and Recommendations of the Academy's State of the Science Conference on Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures , 2009 .

[2]  Alberto Esquenazi,et al.  Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Bowden Cable Actuator for Force-Feedback Exoskeletons , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  L Vodovnik,et al.  Information content of myo-control signals for orthotic and prosthetic systems. , 1974, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  P. Dario,et al.  Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. , 2002, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[6]  Susan Procter,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of a New Design Prosthetic Prehensor , 1991 .

[7]  Jonathon W Sensinger,et al.  Comparison of body-powered voluntary opening and voluntary closing prehensor for activities of daily life. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[8]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[9]  P. Herberts The Control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses , 1974 .

[10]  S Micera,et al.  Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Timothy Sullivan,et al.  Design and Fabrication of a Hybrid Body-Powered Prosthetic Hand With Voluntary Opening and Voluntary Closing Capabilities , 2011 .

[12]  M LeBlanc,et al.  Preliminary assessment of three new designs of prosthetic prehensors for upper limb amputees , 1988, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Voluntary‐Opening Prehensors with Adjustable Grip Force , 1995 .

[14]  G. Smit,et al.  Efficiency of Voluntary Closing Hand and Hook Prostheses , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[15]  Richard F. ff. Weir,et al.  CHAPTER 32 DESIGN OF ARTIFICIAL ARMS AND HANDS FOR PROSTHETIC APPLICATIONS , 2005 .

[16]  Smith Dg,et al.  Atlas Of Amputations and Limb Deficiencies : Surgical, Prosthetic, and Rehabilitation Principles , 2004 .

[17]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.