Characterization of a continuous agitated cell reactor for oxygen dependent biocatalysis

Biocatalytic oxidation reactions employing molecular oxygen as the electron acceptor are difficult to conduct in a continuous flow reactor because of the requirement for high oxygen transfer rates. In this paper, the oxidation of glucose to glucono‐1,5‐lactone by glucose oxidase was used as a model reaction to study a novel continuous agitated cell reactor (ACR). The ACR consists of ten cells interconnected by small channels. An agitator is placed in each cell, which mixes the content of the cell when the reactor body is shaken by lateral movement. Based on tracer experiments, a hydrodynamic model for the ACR was developed. The model consisted of ten tanks‐in‐series with back‐mixing occurring within and between each cell. The back‐mixing was a necessary addition to the model in order to explain the observed phenomenon that the ACR behaved as two continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) at low flow rates, while it at high flow rates behaved as the expected ten CSTRs in series. The performance of the ACR was evaluated by comparing the steady state conversion at varying residence times with the conversion observed in a stirred batch reactor of comparable size. It was found that the ACR could more than double the overall reaction rate, which was solely due to an increased oxygen transfer rate in the ACR caused by the intense mixing as a result of the spring agitators. The volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient, kLa, was estimated to be 344 h−1 in the 100 mL ACR, opposed to only 104 h−1 in a batch reactor of comparable working volume. Interestingly, the large deviation from plug flow behavior seen in the tracer experiments was found to have little influence on the conversion in the ACR, since both a plug flow reactor (PFR) model and the backflow cell model described the data sufficiently well. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 1222–1230. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  S. M. Stocks,et al.  Industrial enzyme production for the food and beverage industries: process scale up and scale down , 2013 .

[2]  A. Karau,et al.  Deactivation of Formate Dehydrogenase (FDH) in Solution and at Gas‐Liquid Interfaces , 2005, Biotechnology progress.

[3]  Andreas Schmid,et al.  Biocatalytic Production of Catechols Using a High Pressure Tube-in-Tube Segmented Flow Microreactor , 2014 .

[4]  Ed Jones,et al.  Scaling Up Biocatalysis Reactions in Flow Reactors , 2012 .

[5]  C. Wiles,et al.  Continuous flow reactors: a perspective , 2012 .

[6]  Wolfgang Kroutil,et al.  Biocatalytic Oxidation of Primary and Secondary Alcohols , 2004 .

[7]  A W Nienow,et al.  A fluid dynamic study of the retrofitting of large agitated bioreactors: Turbulent flow , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  Pär Tufvesson,et al.  Process considerations for the scale-up and implementation of biocatalysis , 2010 .

[9]  Robert Ashe,et al.  Continuous Flow Processing of Slurries: Evaluation of an Agitated Cell Reactor , 2011 .

[10]  F. García-Ochoa,et al.  Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.

[11]  D. Combes,et al.  Influence of additives on the thermostability of glucose oxidase , 1988 .

[12]  S. M. Glueck,et al.  The substrate tolerance of alcohol oxidases , 2015, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[13]  L. D. Durbin,et al.  Transient Response and Moments Analysis of Backflow Cell Model for Flow Systems with Longitudinal Mixing , 1967 .

[14]  Krist V Gernaey,et al.  Microscale technology and biocatalytic processes: opportunities and challenges for synthesis. , 2015, Trends in biotechnology.

[15]  Santiago Gómez-Quero,et al.  Liquid phase catalytic hydrodechlorination of 2,4-dichlorophenol over Pd/Al2O3: Batch vs. continuous operation , 2011 .

[16]  V MASSEY,et al.  KINETICS AND MECHANISM OF ACTION OF GLUCOSE OXIDASE. , 1964, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  Marvin Charles,et al.  Fermentation scale-up: Problems and possibilities , 1985 .

[18]  John M. Woodley,et al.  Process Requirements of Galactose Oxidase Catalyzed Oxidation of Alcohols , 2015 .

[19]  N. Kockmann,et al.  Microreactor Technology and Continuous Processes in the Fine Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industry: Is the Revolution Underway? , 2008 .

[20]  R. Fernández-Lafuente,et al.  Dextran aldehyde coating of glucose oxidase immobilized on magnetic nanoparticles prevents its inactivation by gas bubbles , 2005 .

[21]  Yatish T. Shah,et al.  Backmixing in gas‐liquid reactors , 1978 .

[22]  C. Oliver Kappe,et al.  Continuous-Flow Technology — A Tool for the Safe Manufacturing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients , 2015 .

[23]  Zhicheng Zhang,et al.  Lactonization and Protonation of Gluconic Acid: A Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study by Potentiometry, NMR and ESI-MS , 2007 .

[24]  Paul Sharratt,et al.  Achieving Continuous Manufacturing: Technologies and Approaches for Synthesis, Workup, and Isolation of Drug Substance May 20-21, 2014 Continuous Manufacturing Symposium. , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[25]  Edward Jones,et al.  Biocatalytic oxidase: Batch to continuous , 2012 .