A novel decision-making approach for light weight environment friendly material selection

Abstract Since the last few decades, the use of light weight automotive is increasing day by day to reduce fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. Now days, the automotive industries are emphasizing more on the use of light weight environment friendly materials (LWEFMs) including aluminium, polymers, magnesium, steel blends and composites due to their several inherent advantages, environmental concerns, government regulations and consumer demand. Light weight metal alloys are much preferable for their low density and high specific strength, as well as other attractive characteristics like high corrosion resistance, dimensional stability, energy saving ability and sustainability. However, deciding on the most competent LWEFM for a distinct application considering multi-perspective criteria is not an easy task to perform and restrain a great challenge for the design engineers. On the other hand, improper material selection often leads to premature product failure with reduced efficiency and poor product performance, thereby negatively affecting the productivity, profitability and status of the organization. In this paper, a humble endeavour is taken to propose a novel and contemporary decision-making approach for LWEFM selection in which criteria weights are computed using the Entropy technique and ranking of the alternatives is determined by an almost unexplored multi-attributive ideal real comparative analysis (MAIRCA) method. Seventeen candidate materials are considered as alternatives for the evaluation with respect to thirteen criteria for an automotive application. It has been observed that Ultra High Strength Steel emerges out as the best material for the considered case study. Comparison with other existing well established methods has also been performed to prove the feasibility and validity of the proposed approach

[1]  Fangwu Ma,et al.  Optimal Lightweight Material Selection for Automobile Applications Considering Multi-Perspective Indices , 2018, IEEE Access.

[2]  Alev Taskin Gumus,et al.  A fuzzy logic based PROMETHEE method for material selection problems , 2018 .

[3]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component , 2012 .

[4]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights , 2013 .

[5]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Development of a hybrid meta-model for material selection using design of experiments and EDAS method , 2018 .

[7]  Ihsan Hakan Selvi,et al.  An expert system based material selection approach to manufacturing , 2013 .

[8]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Evaluating performance of engineering departments in an Indian University using DEMATEL and compromise ranking methods , 2015 .

[9]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[10]  Tej Singh,et al.  Hybrid entropy – TOPSIS approach for energy performance prioritization in a rectangular channel employing impinging air jets , 2017 .

[11]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre , 2018 .

[12]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots , 2016 .

[13]  Rezgar Hasanzadeh,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL POLYMERIC NANOCOMPOSITE MATERIAL SELECTION FOR AUTOMOTIVE BUMPER BEAM USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS , 2017 .

[14]  Sivakumar Dhar Malingam,et al.  Selection of natural fibre reinforced composites using fuzzy VIKOR for car front hood , 2016 .

[15]  Pushparenu Bhattacharjee,et al.  Selection of optimal aluminum alloy using TOPSIS method under fuzzy environment , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[16]  M. Ilangkumaran,et al.  Material selection using hybrid MCDM approach for automobile bumper , 2013 .

[17]  Soh-Khim Ong,et al.  Designing automotive products for remanufacturing from material selection perspective , 2017 .

[18]  Tej Singh,et al.  Selection of brake friction materials using hybrid analytical hierarchy process and vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje approach , 2018 .

[19]  S. Sapuan,et al.  Hybrid natural and glass fibers reinforced polymer composites material selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process for automotive brake lever design , 2013 .

[20]  Ying Zhao,et al.  A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Sustainable Material Selection Considering Life Cycle Assessment Method , 2018, IEEE Access.

[21]  Ibrahim Badi,et al.  Supplier Selection using Rough BWM-MAIRCA model: A case study in Pharmaceutical Supplying in Libya , 2018, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[22]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of grey relational analysis for material and end of life strategy selection with multiple criteria , 2017 .

[23]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Multi-criteria FUCOM-MAIRCA model for the evaluation of level crossings: case study in the Republic of Serbia , 2019 .

[24]  Zahari Taha,et al.  Optimal multi-material selection for lightweight design of automotive body assembly incorporating recyclability , 2013 .