A new vibrator to stimulate muscle proprioceptors in fMRI

Studying cognitive brain functions by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) requires appropriate stimulation devices that do not interfere with the magnetic fields. Since the emergence of fMRI in the 90s, a number of stimulation devices have been developed for the visual and auditory modalities. Only few devices, however, have been developed for the somesthesic modality. Here, we present a vibration device for studying somesthesia that is compatible with high magnetic field environments and that can be used in fMRI machines. This device consists of a poly vinyl chloride (PVC) vibrator containing a wind turbine and of a pneumatic apparatus that controls 1–6 vibrators simultaneously. Just like classical electromagnetic vibrators, our device stimulates muscle mechanoreceptors (muscle spindles) and generates reliable illusions of movement. We provide the fMRI compatibility data (phantom test), the calibration curve (vibration frequency as a function of air flow), as well as the results of a kinesthetic test (perceived speed of the illusory movement as a function of vibration frequency). This device was used successfully in several brain imaging studies using both fMRI and magnetoencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P. Matthews,et al.  Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions , 1974 .

[2]  Roll Jp,et al.  Proprioceptive sensory codes mediating movement trajectory perception: human hand vibration-induced drawing illusions. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[3]  J. Roll,et al.  Proprioceptive sensory codes mediating movement trajectory perception: human hand vibration-induced drawing illusions. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[4]  J. Roll,et al.  Eye and neck proprioceptive messages contribute to the spatial coding of retinal input in visually oriented activities , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Information integration in perception and communication , 1996 .

[6]  J. Roll,et al.  Proprio-tactile integration for kinesthetic perception: An fMRI study , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  J. Fitzsimmons,et al.  Barium sulfate suspension as a negative oral MRI contrast agent: in vitro and human optimization studies. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  P. Valette,et al.  Exploration radiologique de l’intestin grêle en 2005 , 2005, Acta Endoscopica.

[9]  J. Roll,et al.  Motor and parietal cortical areas both underlie kinaesthesia. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  Anne Kavounoudias,et al.  Cerebral correlates of the “Kohnstamm phenomenon”: An fMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  D. Burke,et al.  The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non‐contracting muscles. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  J. Roll,et al.  Long-lasting body leanings following neck muscle isometric contractions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  G S Harrington,et al.  A new vibrotactile stimulator for functional MRI , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Mark E. Ladd,et al.  Cerebral activation using a MR-compatible piezoelectric actuator with adjustable vibration frequencies and in vivo wave propagation control , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  J. Roll,et al.  Muscle Spindle Contribution to the Coding of Motor Activities in Man , 1983 .

[16]  J P Roll,et al.  Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  D B Plewes,et al.  New devices to deliver somatosensory stimuli during functional MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  J. Schenck.  The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[19]  J. Roll,et al.  Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Edmund T Rolls,et al.  Consciousness absent and present: a neurophysiological exploration. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[21]  C. Bard,et al.  The role of proprioceptive information for the production of isometric forces and for handwriting tasks. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Nikolaus M. Szeverenyi,et al.  Fingertip Representation in the Human Somatosensory Cortex: An fMRI Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[23]  E. Ribot-Ciscar,et al.  The Ia afferent feedback of a given movement evokes the illusion of the same movement when returned to the subject via muscle tendon vibration , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  C. Marsden.  The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia , 1982, Neurology.

[25]  D. McCloskey,et al.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  J. Roll,et al.  Relations between the directions of vibration-induced kinesthetic illusions and the pattern of activation of antagonist muscles , 2000, Brain Research.

[27]  J. C. Gilhodes,et al.  Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  J. Roll,et al.  Cortical correlates of illusory hand movement perception in humans: A MEG study , 2006, Brain Research.

[29]  J. Roll,et al.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  L. Jones.  Motor illusions: what do they reveal about proprioception? , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  Frédéric Albert,et al.  “Proprioceptive signature” of cursive writing in humans: a multi-population coding , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  R. Briggs,et al.  A pneumatic vibrotactile stimulation device for fMRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Klaus Sartor,et al.  Somatotopic mapping of the human primary somatosensory cortex by fully automated tactile stimulation using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  G. Eklund.  Position sense and state of contraction; the effects of vibration , 1972 .

[35]  D. Burke,et al.  The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration during isometric contraction. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  Jean-Claude Gilhodes,et al.  Propriomuscular coding of kinaesthetic sensation , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.