Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines

BackgroundWith minimally invasive surgery (MIS), a man–machine environment was brought into the operating room, which created mental and physical challenges for the operating team. The science of ergonomics analyzes these challenges and formulates guidelines for creating a work environment that is safe and comfortable for its operators while effectiveness and efficiency of the process are maintained. This review aimed to formulate the ergonomic challenges related to monitor positioning in MIS. Background and guidelines are formulated for optimal ergonomic monitor positioning within the possibilities of the modern MIS suite, using multiple monitors suspended from the ceiling.MethodsAll evidence-based experimental ergonomic studies conducted in the fields of laparoscopic surgery and applied ergonomics for other professions working with a display were identified by PubMed searches and selected for quality and applicability. Data from ergonomic studies were evaluated in terms of effectiveness and efficiency as well as comfort and safety aspects. Recommendations for individual monitor positioning are formulated to create a personal balance between these two ergonomic aspects.ResultsMisalignment in the eye–hand–target axis because of limited freedom in monitor positioning is recognized as an important ergonomic drawback during MIS. Realignment of the eye–hand–target axis improves personal values of comfort and safety as well as procedural values of effectiveness and efficiency.ConclusionsMonitor position is an important ergonomic factor during MIS. In the horizontal plain, the monitor should be straight in front of each person and aligned with the forearm–instrument motor axis to avoid axial rotation of the spine. In the sagittal plain, the monitor should be positioned lower than eye level to avoid neck extension.

[1]  J P Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[3]  M Gagner,et al.  The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century. A discussion of critical design elements. , 2001, Surgical endoscopy.

[4]  A. Hemal,et al.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy. , 2001, Journal of endourology.

[5]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Developing Technology for Suspended Imaging for Minimal Access Surgery , 1997, Seminars in laparoscopic surgery.

[6]  M. A. Veelen,et al.  Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  F. Luks,et al.  In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy. , 2003, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[8]  D W Rattner,et al.  Optical imaging technology in minimally invasive surgery. Current status and future directions. , 1999, Surgical endoscopy.

[9]  Garth H Ballantyne,et al.  The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[10]  T Wittig,et al.  Influence of screen and copy holder positions on head posture, muscle activity and user judgement. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Comparison of conventional and gaze-down imaging in laparoscopic task performance , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  C. Giebmeyer,et al.  Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[13]  D. Meijer,et al.  Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems, during laparoscopy , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[15]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[16]  Carolyn M. Sommerich,et al.  Effects of Computer Monitor Viewing Angle and Related Factors on Strain, Performance, and Preference Outcomes , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[17]  L. Swanström,et al.  Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  S M McGill,et al.  Lumbar erector spinae oxygenation during prolonged contractions: implications for prolonged work , 2000, Ergonomics.

[19]  R. Berguer,et al.  A comparison of operating room crowding between open and laparoscopic operations , 1996, Surgical Endoscopy.

[20]  R E Lees,et al.  A cross-sectional study of health complaints among 79 data entry operators using video display terminals. , 1991, The Journal of the Society of Occupational Medicine.

[21]  Liam A. Haveran,et al.  Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[22]  W Jaschinski-Kruza,et al.  Eyestrain in VDU Users: Viewing Distance and the Resting Position of Ocular Muscles , 1991, Human factors.

[23]  H. Krueger,et al.  Direction of gaze and comfort: discovering the relation for the ergonomic optimization of visual tasks , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  N. Wade,et al.  Assessing the benefits of “gaze-down” display location in complex tasks , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[25]  G. Berci,et al.  The operating room of the future: what, when and why? , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[26]  R Berguer,et al.  Surgery and ergonomics. , 1999, Archives of surgery.

[27]  A. Gallagher,et al.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. , 1998, Endoscopy.

[28]  M. Gauderer,et al.  Imaging for endoscopic surgery: new developments applicable to pediatric surgical interventions , 2002, Pediatric Surgery International.

[29]  A. Spaepen,et al.  Posture, muscle activity and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings , 2003, Ergonomics.

[30]  H Kylian,et al.  Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[31]  R. Berguer,et al.  A comparison of surgeons' posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[32]  O. Svensson,et al.  The influence of the viewing angle on neck-load during work with video display units. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[33]  J. R. Engsberg,et al.  Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy.

[34]  Jennie P. Psihogios,et al.  The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15° and 40° recommendations , 1998 .

[35]  G. Ballantyne.  Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. , 2002, Surgical endoscopy.

[36]  J. Zehetner,et al.  Screen height as an ergonomic factor in laparoscopic surgery , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[37]  Mark S. Sanders,et al.  Human factors in engineering and design, 7th ed. , 1993 .

[38]  Mark S. Sanders,et al.  Human Factors in Engineering and Design , 2016 .

[39]  L M Schleifer,et al.  Work Posture, Workstation Design, and Musculoskeletal Discomfort in a VDT Data Entry Task , 1991, Human factors.

[40]  R Berguer,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons' axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. , 2001, American journal of surgery.

[41]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.