Stem cells as an emerging paradigm in stroke 3: enhancing the development of clinical trials.

Cell-based therapy continues to grow as a new field to explore investigational treatments for stroke. Leaders from academia and industry convened an inaugural meeting in 2007 with members of the National Institutes of Health and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to generate consensus-based guidelines on the development of cell therapies for stroke, entitled “Stem Cells as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke” (STEPS).1 These guidelines focused on preclinical studies that are considered important as part of a development program to support clinical testing of cell therapies. The STEPS meeting also provided recommendations on the conduct of early-stage clinical trials. Given the rapid advances in the field, a second meeting was held in 2009 to update and expand these guidelines, which were published as STEPS 2.2 In December 2011, investigators in academia, industry leaders, and members of the National Institutes of Health and FDA gathered at a third meeting, STEPS 3, to discuss emerging data on the mechanisms of action of cell therapy, the barriers to successful translation from animal models to patients, and the design of current clinical trials for acute and chronic stroke. Since the prior STEPS meeting, there are now several active cell therapy platforms for stroke and other neurological disorders, in stages that range from preclinical to clinical trials, and with sponsors that include industry, the National Institutes of Health, and the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine. As the field continues to progress and as pilot clinical studies are starting to show safety for some cell types, it has become necessary to formulate a new set of guidelines that address topics not covered in prior STEPS publications. Specifically, the current document reflects a compilation of recommendations that focus on more advanced stages of clinical testing, as well as the testing of cell therapies in a broader …

[1]  S. Cramer,et al.  The case for modality-specific outcome measures in clinical trials of stroke recovery-promoting agents. , 2007, Stroke.

[2]  Yi Li,et al.  Therapeutic Benefit of Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Administered 1 Month after Stroke , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  P. Stieg,et al.  Neurotransplantation of Fetal Porcine Cells in Patients with Basal Ganglia Infarcts: A Preliminary Safety and Feasibility Study , 2005, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[4]  R. Seitz,et al.  Restoring Neuronal Function After Stroke by Cell Replacement: Anatomic and Functional Considerations , 2011, Stroke.

[5]  J. Sinden,et al.  The Neural Stem Cell Line CTX0E03 Promotes Behavioral Recovery and Endogenous Neurogenesis After Experimental Stroke in a Dose-Dependent Fashion , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[6]  Michel Modo,et al.  Implantation Site and Lesion Topology Determine Efficacy of a Human Neural Stem Cell Line in a Rat Model of Chronic Stroke , 2012, Stem cells.

[7]  Takuya Matsunaga,et al.  Intravenous administration of auto serum-expanded autologous mesenchymal stem cells in stroke. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  T. Yasuhara,et al.  Notch-induced rat and human bone marrow stromal cell grafts reduce ischemic cell loss and ameliorate behavioral deficits in chronic stroke animals. , 2009, Stem cells and development.

[9]  D. Geschwind,et al.  Inosine Augments the Effects of a Nogo Receptor Blocker and of Environmental Enrichment to Restore Skilled Forelimb Use after Stroke , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Barbay,et al.  Combination of NEP 1-40 Treatment and Motor Training Enhances Behavioral Recovery After a Focal Cortical Infarct in Rats , 2010, Stroke.

[11]  Ross Zafonte,et al.  Neurotransplantation for patients with subcortical motor stroke: a phase 2 randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  Marta P Pereira,et al.  Human neural stem cells enhance structural plasticity and axonal transport in the ischaemic brain , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  Ivo D Dinov,et al.  A role for ephrin-A5 in axonal sprouting, recovery, and activity-dependent plasticity after stroke , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  P. Bickford,et al.  Cord blood rescues stroke-induced changes in splenocyte phenotype and function , 2006, Experimental Neurology.

[15]  Sara Riggare,et al.  Sham neurosurgical procedures: the patients' perspective , 2012, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  Carolee J Winstein,et al.  Design for the Everest Randomized Trial of Cortical Stimulation and Rehabilitation for Arm Function Following Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  S. Cramer Stratifying patients with stroke in trials that target brain repair. , 2010, Stroke.

[19]  F. Chollet,et al.  Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2011, The Lancet Neurology.

[20]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Biomarkers of recovery after stroke , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[21]  Michael Chopp,et al.  Stem Cell Therapy as an Emerging Paradigm for Stroke (STEPS) II , 2011, Stroke.

[22]  M. Chopp,et al.  Neurorestorative therapies for stroke: underlying mechanisms and translation to the clinic , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[23]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Transplantation of Cryopreserved Human Embryonal Carcinoma-Derived Neurons (NT2N Cells) Promotes Functional Recovery in Ischemic Rats , 1998, Experimental Neurology.

[24]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  JulieBernhardt,et al.  A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial for Stroke (AVERT) , 2008 .

[26]  Bruce H Dobkin,et al.  Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[27]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Ropinirole in Chronic Stroke , 2009, Stroke.

[28]  J. Grotta,et al.  Intravenous autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for ischemic stroke , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[29]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Additional Services and Information for Inter-individual Variability in the Capacity for Motor Recovery after Ischemic Stroke , 2022 .

[30]  Marc Fisher,et al.  Update of the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable Preclinical Recommendations , 2009, Stroke.

[31]  D. Corbett,et al.  Enriched environment enhances transplanted subventricular zone stem cell migration and functional recovery after stroke , 2007, Neuroscience.

[32]  B. Reynolds Stem Cell Therapies as an Emerging Paradigm in Stroke (STEPS): Bridging Basic and Clinical Science for Cellular and Neurogenic Factor Therapy in Treating Stroke , 2009, Stroke.

[33]  C. Stinear,et al.  Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.