Interacting with trapped victims using robots

The paper reports on a discovery field exercise used to examine how disaster responders can use an audio and video equipped robot to interact with a trapped victim. In the exercise, a small robot with two-way video and audio communication was inserted into a physically simulated building collapse next to a trapped victim, and was provided to a team of trained responders as a means for performing remote triage and victim monitoring. The interaction between the responders and the victim was examined, with emphasis on how the responders adapted to different video and audio capabilities, and how they might have responded to different populations and injuries that may limit communication. The ad hoc interaction protocols used by the responders were observed in the field exercise, and four interaction schemes were identified: Two-way Video with Two-way Audio, One-way Video (from Robot to Responders) with Two-way Audio, Two-way Video with no Audio, and One-way Video (from Robot to Responders) with no audio. The interaction schemes are defined according to the minimum capabilities of the robot and victim, the requirements of the responders, and preliminary protocols required for each interaction scheme. From observations made about the exercise, the paper identifies minimalistic interfaces and transparency of robot state as key areas for improving a robot-mediated interaction between responders and victims.

[1]  Ashley Gross,et al.  Robotic Casualty Extraction in Hazardous Environments , 2008 .

[2]  Timothy J. Broderick,et al.  Military Robotic Combat Casualty Extraction and Care , 2011 .

[3]  R.R. Murphy,et al.  Robot-assisted medical reachback: a survey of how medical personnel expect to interact with rescue robots , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[4]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Towards Robot-Assisted Mass-Casualty Triage , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control.

[5]  Ching-Fang Lin,et al.  Imaging components for a robotic casualty evaluation system , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  A multi-disciplinary design process for affective robots: Case study of Survivor Buddy 2.0 , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Preliminary observation of HRI in robot-assisted medical response , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[8]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Non-facial and non-verbal affective expression in appearance-constrained robots for use in victim management: Robots to the rescue! , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Development of attachable tele-echography robot by a bystander at injury scene , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[10]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  A proposal of user friendly alive human detection robot to tackle crisis situation , 2012, 2012 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems.

[11]  Sukho Park,et al.  Development of Biomedical Microrobot for Intravascular Therapy , 2010 .

[12]  Maki K. Habib,et al.  Robot-Assisted Risky Intervention, Search, Rescue and Environmental Surveillance , 2010 .

[13]  T. Juhana,et al.  Mobile application for rapid disaster victim assessment , 2012, 2012 7th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA).

[14]  Mark Yim,et al.  Towards Small Robot Aided Victim Manipulation , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security & Rescue Robotics (SSRR 2009).

[15]  Ichiro Fukumoto,et al.  A study of operational liability of the medical rescue robot under disaster , 2011, 2011 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII).