Understanding consumers perception of conventional and functional yogurts using word association and hard laddering

Abstract Consumers’ perceptions of conventional (regular plain yogurt, low-calorie and low-fat yogurt) and functional yogurts (enriched with fibre and antioxidants) were studied using word association and hard laddering. Both methodologies provided similar results, being consumers’ perceptions of these products mainly related to health, nutrition, sensory characteristics and pleasure. However, both methodologies provided different information. Word association provided information about attributes that were relevant for consumers’ acceptance of a product, common defects of products in the marketplace, motives behind consumers’ choice and attributes that might limit consumers’ interest in the product. On the other hand, hard laddering allowed the identification of more consequences and values related to product attributes, and the links between them, which could be useful for understanding consumers’ choices. Besides, word association was more sensitive than hard laddering in determining differences between groups of consumers with different attitudes towards health and nutrition. Results suggested that word association might be an interesting and useful qualitative technique for product development.

[1]  Liisa Lähteenmäki,et al.  Exploring consumers perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association , 2006 .

[2]  Catherine Georgina Russell,et al.  A comparison of three laddering techniques applied to an example of a complex food choice , 2004 .

[3]  Norbert Schmitt,et al.  Quantifying word association responses: what is native-like? , 1998 .

[4]  R. Friele,et al.  Demographic and lifestyle characteristics of functional food consumers and dietary supplement users , 2003, British Journal of Nutrition.

[5]  Tasos Hovardas,et al.  Word Associations as a Tool for Assessing Conceptual Change in Science Education. , 2006 .

[6]  K. Roininen,et al.  Quantification of Consumer Attitudes to Health and Hedonic Characteristics of Foods , 1999, Appetite.

[7]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Influence of gender, age and motives underlying food choice on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods , 2007, Appetite.

[8]  L C Gilbert,et al.  The Functional Food Trend: What’s Next And What Americans Think About Eggs , 2000, Journal of the American College of Nutrition.

[9]  Gastón Ares,et al.  URUGUAYAN CONSUMERS' PERCEPTION OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS , 2008 .

[10]  Jacob Poulsen,et al.  Danish consumers’ attitudes towards functional foods , 1999 .

[11]  Armand V. Cardello,et al.  Consumer responses to an off-flavor in juice in the presence of specific health claims , 2002 .

[12]  K. Grunert,et al.  Measuring subjective meaning structures by the laddering method: Theoretical considerations and methodological problems , 1995 .

[13]  Jeremy J Tree,et al.  Word association norms for two cohorts of British adults , 2001, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[14]  T. Ross.  The reliability of cluster and switch scores for the Controlled Oral Word Association Test. , 2003, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[15]  R. Clarke,et al.  Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis , 1985 .

[16]  Liisa Lähteenmäki,et al.  Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices , 2003 .

[17]  N. Childs,et al.  Foods that help prevent disease: consumer attitudes and public policy implications , 1997 .

[18]  Pieter A. D. Musters,et al.  Text analysis of open-ended survey responses : a complementary method to preference mapping , 2003 .

[19]  Klaus Menrad,et al.  Market and marketing of functional food in Europe , 2003 .

[20]  Wim Verbeke,et al.  Functional foods: Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health? , 2006 .

[21]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques , 2005 .

[22]  T. J. Reynolds,et al.  Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. , 2001 .

[23]  Alain Clémence,et al.  The Quantitative Analysis Of Social Representations , 1993 .

[24]  J. Wardle,et al.  Development of a Measure of the Motives Underlying the Selection of Food: the Food Choice Questionnaire , 1995, Appetite.

[25]  A. Koster,et al.  Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory , 2004, Appetite.

[26]  Günther Botschen,et al.  Hard versus Soft Laddering: Implications for Appropriate Use , 1998 .

[27]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Food choice and food consumption frequency for Uruguayan consumers , 2008, International journal of food sciences and nutrition.

[28]  P Leppard,et al.  A comparison of paper-and-pencil and computerised methods of “hard” laddering , 2004 .

[29]  W. Wagner,et al.  Relevance, discourse and the ‘hot’ stable core social representations—A structural analysis of word associations , 1996 .