Building synergies between climate change mitigation and energy poverty alleviation

Even though energy poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation are inextricably linked policy goals, they have remained as relatively disconnected fields of research inquiry and policy development. Acknowledging this gap, this paper explores the mainstream academic and policy literatures to provide a taxonomy of interactions and identify synergies and trade-offs between them. The most important trade-off identified is the potential increase in energy poverty levels as a result of strong climate change action if the internalisation of the external costs of carbon emissions is not offset by efficiency gains. The most significant synergy was found in deep energy efficiency in buildings. The paper argues that neither of the two problems – deep reductions in GHG emissions by mid-century, and energy poverty eradication – is likely to be solved fully on their own merit, while joining the two policy goals may provide a very solid case for deep efficiency improvements. Thus, the paper calls for a strong integration of these two policy goals (plus other key related benefits like energy security or employment), in order to provide sufficient policy motivation to mobilise a wide-scale implementation of deep energy efficiency standards.

[1]  J. Peter Clinch,et al.  Quantifying the severity of fuel poverty, its relationship with poor housing and reasons for non-investment in energy-saving measures in Ireland , 2004 .

[2]  S. Herrero,et al.  FUEL POVERTY IN HUNGARY A first assessment , 2010 .

[3]  Stefan Buzar,et al.  When Homes Become Prisons: The Relational Spaces of Postsocialist Energy Poverty , 2007 .

[4]  Barbara Schlomann,et al.  Study on the energy savings potentials in EU member states, candidate countries and EEA countries : final report , 2011 .

[5]  Brenda Boardman,et al.  Fixing Fuel Poverty: Challenges and Solutions , 2009 .

[6]  R. Pollin,et al.  The Economic Benefits of Investing in Clean Energy: How the Economic Stimulus Program and New Legislation Can Boost U.S. Economic Growth and Employment , 2009 .

[7]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Energy end-use: Buildings , 2012 .

[8]  J. Château,et al.  TOWARDS GLOBAL CARBON PRICING: DIRECT AND INDIRECT LINKING OF CARBON MARKETS , 2014 .

[9]  Diana Ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Trapped in the heat: A post-communist type of fuel poverty , 2012 .

[10]  Associates Pty Ltd,et al.  Volume 1: Summary Report , 2006 .

[11]  John Holmberg,et al.  Quantifying the rebound effects of energy efficiency improvements and energy conserving behaviour in Sweden , 2009 .

[12]  Katarína Korytárová.  Energy savings potential in the Hungarian public buildings for space heating , 2010 .

[13]  J. Clinch,et al.  Cost-benefit Analysis of Domestic Energy Efficiency , 2001 .

[14]  Linda Taylor,et al.  Fuel Poverty: From Cold Homes to Affordable Warmth , 1993 .

[15]  Jun Li,et al.  Towards a low-carbon future in China's building sector—A review of energy and climate models forecast , 2008 .

[16]  G. Donaldson.  Cold exposure and winter mortality from ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, respiratory disease, and all causes in warm and cold regions of Europe , 1997, The Lancet.

[17]  J. Clinch,et al.  Fuel poverty, thermal comfort and occupancy: results of a national household-survey in Ireland , 2002 .

[18]  Fatih Birol,et al.  Energy Economics: A Place for Energy Poverty in the Agenda? , 2007 .

[19]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Seven steps to curb global warming , 2007 .

[20]  D. Rübbelke,et al.  Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policy , 2003 .

[21]  S. Friel.  Housing, Fuel Poverty and Health: A Pan-european Analysis , 2007 .

[22]  Peter Heindl,et al.  Measuring Fuel Poverty: General Considerations and Application to German Household Data , 2013 .

[23]  Harriet Thomson,et al.  Quantifying the prevalence of fuel poverty across the European Union , 2013 .

[24]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[25]  Eivind Hovden,et al.  Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework , 2003 .

[26]  伊藤 秀一.  Poverty in the United Kingdom , 1999 .

[27]  C. Liddell,et al.  Fuel Poverty and Human Health : A Review of Recent Evidence , 2010 .

[28]  D. ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Potentials and costs of carbon dioxide mitigation in the world's buildings , 2008 .

[29]  A. Sagar.  Alleviating energy poverty for the world's poor , 2005 .

[30]  Diana Ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Co-benefits quantified: Employment, energy security and fuel poverty implications of the large-scale, deep retrofitting of the Hungarian building stock , 2011 .

[31]  David Pearce,et al.  POLICY FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANCILLARY BENEFITS OF CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES , 2000 .

[32]  D. Rübbelke,et al.  Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policy / Sekundäre Nutzen der Klimapolitik , 2004 .

[33]  Diana Ürge-Vorsatz,et al.  Energy in transition: From the iron curtain to the European Union , 2006 .

[34]  B. Boardman,et al.  Making cold homes warmer: the effect of energy efficiency improvements in low-income homes A report to the Energy Action Grants Agency Charitable Trust , 2000 .

[35]  Daniel Spreng,et al.  Energy use and energy access in relation to poverty , 2003 .

[36]  J. Healy.  Housing, Fuel Poverty and Health: A Pan-European Analysis , 2004 .

[37]  Stefan Buzar,et al.  The ‘hidden’ geographies of energy poverty in post-socialism: Between institutions and households , 2007 .

[38]  J. Healy.  Fuel Poverty and Policy in Ireland and the European Union , 2003 .

[39]  Leslie Daryl Danny Harvey,et al.  Energy efficiency and the demand for energy services , 2010 .