Flanker interference in young and older participants as reflected in event-related potentials

The present study investigates behavioural and event-related potential (ERP) differences between young and older participants in two variants of a flanker task. Flankers preceded the target by 100 ms (Experiment 1) or were presented simultaneously with the target (Experiment 2). In both experiments the response times showed an age-related slowing and a compatibility effect, which did not differ significantly across age. The older participants committed only half as many errors as the young ones. The visual ERPs revealed that the speed of visual perception was similar between groups. In addition the processing of the targets, but not of the flankers, appeared to be enhanced in the older participants. Moreover the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) started later and was larger for old vs. young participants, which was most pronounced for the incorrect LRP activation due to the flankers. The LRP amplitude effect is due to an enhanced activation over contralateral motor areas, which appears to be a general finding unrelated to the error rate. In summary, in the present study we could not find evidence for enhanced flanker interference in the performance of older compared to young participants. The reduced error rates for older participants are likely due to enhanced processing of the targets and delayed transmission of flanker information from visual to motor areas.

[1]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[3]  Alexa B. Roggeveen,et al.  Lateralized readiness potentials reveal motor slowing in the aging brain. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[4]  J. Lupiáñez,et al.  Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials , 2006, Brain Research.

[5]  C. Rosano,et al.  Functional neuroimaging indicators of successful executive control in the oldest old , 2005, NeuroImage.

[6]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[7]  A. Osman,et al.  Mechanisms of speed–accuracy tradeoff: evidence from covert motor processes , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[8]  Borís Burle,et al.  Deficit in motor cortical activity for simultaneous bimanual responses , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  B. Kopp,et al.  N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[10]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  L. S. Miller,et al.  Age-related decrements in performance on a brief continuous performance test. , 2005, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[12]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Age, executive function, and social decision making: a dorsolateral prefrontal theory of cognitive aging. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[13]  Jens C. Pruessner,et al.  Regional Frontal Cortical Volumes Decrease Differentially in Aging: An MRI Study to Compare Volumetric Approaches and Voxel-Based Morphometry , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Diego Fernandez-Duque,et al.  Attentional networks in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[16]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  The enhanced Simon effect for older adults is reduced when the irrelevant location information is conveyed by an accessory stimulus. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[17]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[18]  A Kok,et al.  Age-related differences in the timing of stimulus and response processes during visual selective attention: performance and psychophysiological analyses. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[19]  A. Kok.  Age-related changes in involuntary and voluntary attention as reflected in components of the event-related potential (ERP) , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[20]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[21]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  J. Polich.  Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  T. Braver,et al.  A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[24]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Coles.  Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[26]  Cheryl L. Dickter,et al.  Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Huifang Wang,et al.  Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information , 1995 .

[28]  G. Mulder,et al.  Focussing on aging: an electrophysiological exploration of spatial and attentional processing during reading , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[29]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Mental resources, processing speed, and inhibitory control: a developmental perspective , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[30]  A Kok,et al.  Varieties of inhibition: manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[31]  C M Moore,et al.  Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects of LRP onset. , 1995, Acta psychologica.

[32]  Piotr Jaskowski,et al.  Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception , 2005 .

[33]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentials. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  T. Salthouse.  Aging and measures of processing speed , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[36]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Spatial S-R Compatibility with Centrally Presented Stimuli: An Event-Related Asymmetry Study on Dimensional Overlap , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[38]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. , 2001 .

[39]  A. Kok.  On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[40]  R. Verleger,et al.  Aging and the Simon task. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[41]  M. Falkenstein,et al.  Effects of aging on slowing of motor-response generation. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[42]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  Michael Falkenstein,et al.  ERP—Correlates of response selection in a response conflict paradigm , 2008, Brain Research.

[44]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Event-related potentials reveal dissociable mechanisms for orienting and focusing visuospatial attention. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[45]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Limits on the application of additive factors logic: Violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing , 1995 .

[46]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[47]  A Kok,et al.  Perceptual factors affecting age-related differences in focused attention: performance and psychophysiological analyses. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[48]  S Pollmann,et al.  ERP and fMRI correlates of endogenous and exogenous focusing of visual‐spatial attention , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[49]  R. West,et al.  An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Central and parietal event-related lateralizations in a flanker task. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[51]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  T Hasbroucq,et al.  Response selection and motor areas: a behavioural and electrophysiological study , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.