The Bone Formation Potency on the Titanium Cap According to the Pore on the Rabbit Calvarium

Purpose: This study is performed to determine the effects of titanium cap with various sizes of pores on bone formation during guided bone regeneration (GBR). Methods: Calvaria from 10 adult male rabbits were chosen as the recipient sites. A trephine bur with a diameter of 10 mm was used to form one round groove on each side of sagittal suture of the cranium, and a round bur with a diameter of 1.5 mm was used to form 6 small holes on the inner circles of round grooves to induce bleeding. In the control group, bone graft was not conducted, and closed titanium cap was fixed in the round groove. Bone graft was not performed in groups 1 and 2, but fixed on titanium caps with 0.2 mm, and 0.5 mm sized pores, respectively. For groups 3, 4, and 5, a synthetic bone graft material (β-tricalcium phosphate, Cerasorb Ⓡ , Germany) was transplanted, and titanium caps without pore, with 0.2 mm and 0.5 mm sized pore were fixed, respectively. The animals were sacrificed 4 weeks after, and clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical evaluation of bone regeneration was performed. Results: In all groups, there were no clinical signs of infection, inflammation or wound dehiscence. Radiographic evaluation revealed well-defined semi-circular radiopacity inside the titanium cap of groups 3, 4, and 5. Histologically, the inner surface of the hemisphere was evenly lined with newly formed bone tissue, as well as grafted bone material in the group 3. In groups 4 and 5, the insertion of connective tissue was observed along the inner surface. However, the overall surface area between the grafts with different holes yielded no statistical significance in the histomorphometrical evaluation. Conclusion: Although the total area of newly formed bone showed no significant difference, excellent bone formation tendency was observed histologically when closed caps were used with bone graft was accompanied.

[1]  R. Sader,et al.  Synthetic, pure-phase beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic granules (Cerasorb) for bone regeneration in the reconstructive surgery of the jaws. , 2006, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  T. Nishida,et al.  Effects of bioactive glass on bone augmentation within a titanium cap in rabbit parietal bone. , 2006, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  Eleftherios Tsiridis,et al.  Bone substitutes: an update. , 2005, Injury.

[4]  P. Buma,et al.  Mechanism of bone incorporation of beta-TCP bone substitute in open wedge tibial osteotomy in patients. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[5]  Young-Hyuk Kwon,et al.  Effect of pore number of titanium mesh on Bone Formation in the procedure of GBR , 2004 .

[6]  G. Szabó,et al.  Long-Term Results With Different Bone Substitutes Used for Sinus Floor Elevation , 2004, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  Yutaka Yamada,et al.  Effects of occlusiveness of a titanium cap on bone generation beyond the skeletal envelope in the rabbit calvarium. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium barrier. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  R. Caffesse,et al.  Enamel matrix derivative and bone healing after guided bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects around implants. A histomorphometric study in dogs. , 2002, Journal of periodontology.

[10]  A. Scarano,et al.  Localized ridge augmentation using titanium micromesh. , 2001, The Journal of oral implantology.

[11]  D. Lundgren,et al.  Influence of barrier occlusiveness on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rat. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  T. von Arx,et al.  Implant placement and simultaneous peri-implant bone grafting using a micro titanium mesh for graft stabilization. , 1998, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[13]  N P Lang,et al.  The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[14]  S. Nyman,et al.  Augmentation of intramembraneous bone beyond the skeletal envelope using an occlusive titanium barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit. , 1995, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  T. Karring,et al.  Augmentation of the rat mandible using guided tissue regeneration. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  C. Thorén,et al.  Creation of new bone by an osteopromotive membrane technique: an experimental study in rats. , 1993, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  J. Trouillet,et al.  Osseointegration of macroporous calcium phosphate ceramics having a different chemical composition. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[18]  C. Misch,et al.  BONE‐GRAFTING MATERIALS IN IMPLANT DENTISTRY , 1993, Implant dentistry.

[19]  P. Branemark,et al.  Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses , 1970, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[20]  Daniel Buser,et al.  Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry , 1994 .

[21]  J Lindström,et al.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. , 1969, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.