Postsurgical Treatment of Split Skin Graft Donor Sites in Dermatological Departments

The surgical removal of split skin grafts (SSGs) leads to superficial wounds that can be covered with different wound dressings. Currently, international guidelines that recommend a standard treatment of the donor sites are not yet established. We developed a questionnaire to evaluate the treatment of SSG donor sites and sent it to all dermatological departments in Germany. Altogether 78 of the 115 contacted departments in Germany participated in our cross-sectional trial. Our analysis reveals that multiple wound dressings with different frequencies of replacement are used. On an average, complete reepithelialization of the donor site takes 14-21 days. Foams and coated gauzes are used in 73% of all surgical procedures for postsurgical treatment of SSG donor sites. Still, neither a significant faster reepithelialization nor a lower rate of wound healing disorders can be assigned to any of the wound dressings. The results of our study indicate that a large number of wound care products and treatment strategies are currently applied on SSG donor sites in dermatological departments in Germany. The selection of the wound dressing is not based on scientific data but rather on the experience of individual experts.

[1]  Markus Stücker,et al.  Modern wound care – practical aspects of non‐interventional topical treatment of patients with chronic wounds , 2014, Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG.

[2]  L. French,et al.  Management of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Calcium Alginate versus Polyurethane Film Dressing , 2013, Dermatology.

[3]  R. de Bree,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of donor‐site wound dressings after split‐skin grafting , 2013, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  L. French,et al.  Alginate Dressing and Polyurethane Film Versus Paraffin Gauze in the Treatment of Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study , 2013, Advances in skin & wound care.

[5]  A. Papp,et al.  Reduced Length of Stay in Hospital for Burn Patients Following a Change in Practice Guidelines: Financial Implications , 2012, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[6]  E. Tiernan,et al.  Management of split skin graft donor sites-results of a national survey. , 2012, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[7]  A. Paggiaro,et al.  Clinical Trial Comparing 3 Different Wound Dressings for the Management of Partial-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites , 2011, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[8]  M. Kneilling,et al.  A modified, improved, easy and fast technique for split‐thickness skin grafting , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  A. Fichter,et al.  The Ideal Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site Dressing: Rediscovery of Polyurethane Film , 2009, Annals of plastic surgery.

[10]  V. Lohsiriwat,et al.  Comparison of the Ionic Silver-Containing Hydrofiber* and Paraffin Gauze Dressing on Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites , 2009, Annals of plastic surgery.

[11]  U. Hillen,et al.  Contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds: Results of a prospective investigation , 2008, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[12]  M. Hermans Results of an Internet Survey on the Treatment of Partial Thickness Burns, Full Thickness Burns, and Donor Sites , 2007, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[13]  P. Terrill,et al.  Split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a comparative study of two absorbent dressings. , 2007, Journal of wound care.

[14]  A. Boulton,et al.  A comparison of diabetic foot ulcer outcomes using negative pressure wound therapy versus historical standard of care , 2007, International wound journal.

[15]  P. Lyall,et al.  Australasian survey of split skin graft donor site dressings. , 2000, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[16]  R. Ablove,et al.  The physiology and technique of skin grafting. , 1997, Hand clinics.

[17]  W. Eaglstein,et al.  The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in superficial wounds. , 1983, The Journal of surgical research.

[18]  G. Winter,et al.  Formation of the Scab and the Rate of Epithelization of Superficial Wounds in the Skin of the Young Domestic Pig , 1962, Nature.

[19]  H. Cutcliffe Skin Grafting , 1872, The Indian medical gazette.