Re-Embodiment and Co-Embodiment: Exploration of social presence for robots and conversational agents

Interactions with multiple conversational agents and social robots are becoming increasingly common. This raises new design challenges: Should agents and robots be modeled after humans, presenting their entity (i.e., social presence) as bound to a single body, or should they take advantage of non-human capabilities, such as moving their social presence from body to body across service touchpoints and contexts? We conducted a User Enactments study in which participants interacted with agents that had one social presence per body, that could re-embody (move their social presence from body to body), and that could co-embody (move their social presence into a body that already contains another). Reactions showed that participants felt comfortable with re-embodying agents, who created more seamless and efficient experiences. Yet situations that required expertise or concentration raised concerns about non-human behaviors. We report on our insights regarding collaboration and coordination with several agents in multi-step interactions.

[1]  Sarah Sharples,et al.  Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life , 2018, CHI.

[2]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Nonverbal leakage in robots: Communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Hung-Hsuan Huang,et al.  Embodied Conversational Agents , 2009 .

[4]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Recognition for psychological boundary of robot , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Speed Dating: Providing a Menu of Possible Futures , 2017 .

[6]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  A User study on visualization of agent migration between two companion robots , 2009 .

[7]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The effect of presence on human-robot interaction , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[8]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Comparing Social Robot, Screen and Voice Interfaces for Smart-Home Control , 2017, CHI.

[9]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[10]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[11]  Khalil Sima'an,et al.  Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship , 2006, Computational Linguistics.

[12]  James L. Szalma,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Prototyping realistic long-term human-robot interaction for the study of agent migration , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[14]  Bill Verplank,et al.  Actors, hairdos & videotape—informance design , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[15]  Tetsuo Ono,et al.  ITACO: Effects to Interactions by Relationships between Humans and Artifacts , 2008, IVA.

[16]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Michael Golembewski,et al.  Ideation decks: a card-based design ideation tool , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[18]  John F. Bradley,et al.  Maintaining the Identify of Dynamically Embodied Agents , 2017 .

[19]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Robot Presence and Human Honesty: Experimental Evidence , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[20]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Rapidly Exploring Application Design Through Speed Dating , 2007, UbiComp.

[21]  Alan Cooper,et al.  About Face 3: the essentials of interaction design , 1995 .

[22]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies in HRI , 2012, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[23]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[24]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Covert robot-robot communication , 2015, HRI 2015.

[25]  Anna-Maria Seeger,et al.  Need a Human ? Anthropomorphic Design and Trustworthiness of Conversational Agents , 2017 .

[26]  Aaron Steinfeld,et al.  From One to Another: How Robot-Robot Interaction Affects Users' Perceptions Following a Transition Between Robots , 2019, 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  "Hey Alexa, What's Up?": A Mixed-Methods Studies of In-Home Conversational Agent Usage , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[28]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[29]  John F. Bradley,et al.  Agent chameleons: agent minds and bodies , 2003, Proceedings 11th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension.

[30]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Whose Job Is It Anyway? A Study of Human-Robot Interaction in a Collaborative Task , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  The boy-robot should bark! : Children's impressions of agent migration into diverse embodiments , 2009 .

[32]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Creating Trustworthy Robots: Lessons and Inspirations from Automated Systems , 2009 .

[33]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Effects of nonverbal communication on efficiency and robustness in human-robot teamwork , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[34]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Anthropomorphic Interactions with a Robot and Robot–like Agent , 2008 .

[35]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Leveraging Robot Embodiment to Facilitate Trust and Smoothness , 2019, 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[37]  Marco Aurélio Gerosa,et al.  Single or Multiple Conversational Agents?: An Interactional Coherence Comparison , 2018, CHI.