Investigating Road Safety Management Systems in the European Countries: Patterns and Particularities

A road safety management (RSM) system can be defined as “a complex institutional structure that involves cooperating and interacting bodies which support the tasks and processes necessary for the prevention and reduction of road traffic injuries”. RSM should promote the road safety progress of the country. However, the details of this relationship are generally lacking. This study explored the RSM systems in European countries based on the information collected through interviews with experts and officials, in each country, and using a “good practice” criteria questionnaire. The dataset included 14 countries with fifty items related to five RSM areas: institutional organization; policy formulation and adoption; policy implementation and funding; monitoring and evaluation; scientific support, information and capacity building. Cluster analyses and correlations were used to identify country groups with similar RSM components, to recognize typical RSM structures if available and to examine the relationship between RSM and road safety performance of the countries. The findings showed that all the countries are different when RSM systems are considered as a whole, making it impossible to identify typical RSM structures or a single best working model at a national level. However, it is possible to compare countries when the RSM areas are considered separately, where the clusters of countries recognized by the study present the patterns common for those European countries. Across the analyses, a number of countries with a consistently higher and lower availability of the RSM components were identified, enabling a final countries’ ranking into a number of groups. The latter actually reflects the level of RSM in the country, in terms of its correspondence to the “good practice” criteria. A further analysis indicated a positive correlation between the higher level of the RSM system and better safety performance of the countries.

[1]  B. Everitt,et al.  Cluster Analysis: Everitt/Cluster Analysis , 2011 .

[2]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[3]  Gabriele Giustiniani,et al.  Analysis of road safety management systems in Europe , 2014 .

[4]  R Elvik,et al.  Quantified road safety targets: a useful tool for policy making? , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Michael R. Anderberg,et al.  Cluster Analysis for Applications , 1973 .

[6]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Road safety management by objectives: a critical analysis of the Norwegian approach. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Yingjie Tian,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Clustering Algorithms , 2015, Annals of Data Science.

[8]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[9]  Nang-Ngai Sze,et al.  Is the effect of quantified road safety targets sustainable , 2010 .

[10]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Does Use of Formal Tools for Road Safety Management Improve Safety Performance? , 2012 .

[11]  Fcm Wegman,et al.  A TRAIL TO A SAFER COUNTRY: CONCEPTUAL APPROACHES TO ROAD SAFETY POLICY , 2000 .

[12]  Luca Persia,et al.  Advancements in Road Safety Management Analysis , 2016 .

[13]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion? , 2011, Journal of Classification.

[14]  B. Everitt,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis with R , 2011 .

[15]  G Jost,et al.  A Challenging Start towards the EU 2020 Road Safety Target: 6th Road Safety PIN Report , 2012 .

[16]  Gabriele Giustiniani,et al.  Analysis of road safety management in the European countries. Deliverable 1.5 Vol.II of the EC FP7 project DaCoTA , 2012 .

[17]  Bjorn Stafbom Implementing the Recommendations of the World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2008 .

[18]  George Yannis,et al.  Is road safety management linked to road safety performance? , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.