Correlation of frictional drag and roughness length scale for transitionally and fully rough turbulent boundary layers

Abstract This study investigates zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers for several rough surfaces in the transitionally rough and fully rough flow regimes. The tested surfaces include, but are not limited to marine antifoulings as irregularly rough engineering surfaces. The boundary layer profiles were measured by using a two-dimensional Laser Doppler Velocimetry system. The coatings were applied with different procedures to simulate the effect of different application types. An attempt was made to find a new roughness length scale which provides a good correlation to represent the roughness functions for both transitionally and fully rough flow regimes. Surface roughness measurements with a laser profilometer device were carried out to determine several roughness parameters to be used in the calculation of the roughness length scale. Different roughness calculation methods, with varying low-pass filter window lengths and sampling lengths, were applied to determine their effect on the roughness parameters and hence the roughness function correlations. The paper presents a new definition for the roughness length scale and covers the details of the measurements, analyses, discussions regarding the differences between the surfaces, the effect of the roughness calculation methods and application type of the antifouling coatings.

[1]  M. Schultz Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering , 2007, Biofouling.

[2]  M. Schultz,et al.  Examination of a critical roughness height for outer layer similarity , 2007 .

[3]  Alexander Smits,et al.  Further observations on the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Henry Darcy Recherches expérimentales relatives au mouvement de l'eau dans les tuyaux , 1857 .

[5]  M. S. Chong,et al.  A possible reinterpretation of the Princeton superpipe data , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Outer flow scaling of smooth and rough wall turbulent boundary layers , 2004 .

[7]  Itiro Tani,et al.  Drag Reduction by Riblet Viewed as Roughness Problem , 1988 .

[8]  J. D. Li,et al.  Experimental support for the attached-eddy hypothesis in zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  R. J. Kind,et al.  Improved Aerodynamic Characterization of Regular Three-Dimensional Roughness , 1998 .

[10]  Characterizing developing adverse pressure gradient flows subject to surface roughness , 2010 .

[11]  J. Jiménez Turbulent flows over rough walls , 2004 .

[12]  J. Nikuradse Laws of Flow in Rough Pipes , 1950 .

[13]  Robert J. Moffat,et al.  Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results , 1988 .

[14]  Karen A. Flack,et al.  Review of Hydraulic Roughness Scales in the Fully Rough Regime , 2010 .

[15]  Mehmet Atlar,et al.  Turbulent boundary layer measurements over flat surfaces coated by nanostructured marine antifoulings , 2012 .

[16]  Michael P. Schultz,et al.  Frictional Resistance of Antifouling Coating Systems , 2004 .

[17]  Karen A. Flack,et al.  The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Robert J. Moffat,et al.  Structure of transitionally rough and fully rough turbulent boundary layers , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Handbook of Surface and Nanometrology , 2002 .

[20]  F. R. Hama Boundary Layer characteristics for smooth and rough surfaces , 1954 .

[21]  Karen A. Flack,et al.  Outer layer similarity in fully rough turbulent boundary layers , 2005 .

[22]  Karen A. Flack,et al.  Turbulent boundary layers on a systematically varied rough wall , 2007 .

[23]  J. S. Medhurst OUTLINE OF A DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR THE MEASUREMENT AND CHARACTERISATION OF ROUGHNESS TOPOGRAPHY IN FLUID FLOW , 1990 .

[24]  C Grigson,et al.  DRAG LOSSES OF NEW SHIPS CAUSED BY HULL FINISH , 1992 .

[25]  B. Behrends,et al.  A review of surface roughness in antifouling coatings illustrating the importance of cutoff length , 2006, Biofouling.

[26]  R. Gould,et al.  Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics , 1996 .

[27]  M. Schultz,et al.  Comparison of three roughness function determination methods , 2003 .

[28]  L. Castillo,et al.  Inner and outer scalings in rough surface zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers , 2007 .

[29]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers , 1989 .

[30]  H. Schlichting Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[31]  R. A. Antonia,et al.  Surface roughness effects in turbulent boundary layers , 1999 .

[32]  C. Meneveau,et al.  Effects of free-stream turbulence on rough surface turbulent boundary layers , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  V. C. Patel,et al.  Perspective: Flow at High Reynolds Number and Over Rough Surfaces—Achilles Heel of CFD , 1998 .

[34]  B. Bowerman Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments, with Applications to Engineering and Science , 1989 .

[35]  O. N. Ramesh,et al.  Determination of skin friction in strong pressure-gradient equilibrium and near-equilibrium turbulent boundary layers , 2009 .

[36]  M. Schultz,et al.  The effect of biofilms on turbulent boundary layers , 1999 .

[37]  R. A. Antonia,et al.  Comparison between rough- and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[38]  P S Granville,et al.  THREE INDIRECT METHODS FOR THE DRAG CHARACTERIZATION OF ARBITRARILY ROUGH SURFACES ON FLAT PLATES , 1987 .

[39]  L. Castillo,et al.  Transitionally rough zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers , 2007 .

[40]  Karen A. Flack,et al.  Turbulent Boundary Layers Over Surfaces Smoothed by Sanding , 2002 .

[41]  Mehmet Atlar,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Turbulent Boundary Layer of Surfaces Coated With Marine Antifoulings , 2005 .

[42]  D. Coles,et al.  The Turbulent Boundary Layer in a Compressible Fluid , 1964 .

[43]  Mehmet Atlar,et al.  On the Drag and Roughness Characteristics of Antifoulings , 2003 .

[44]  P. Bradshaw,et al.  Turbulence structure of a boundary layer beneath a turbulent free stream , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[45]  D. Coles The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer , 1956, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[46]  Atilla Incecik,et al.  A CFD model for the frictional resistance prediction of antifouling coatings , 2014 .

[47]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .

[48]  H. Fernholz,et al.  Skin friction and turbulence measurements in a boundary layer with zero-pressure-gradient under the influence of high intensity free-stream turbulence , 2004 .

[49]  C. F. Colebrook,et al.  Experiments with Fluid Friction in Roughened Pipes , 1937 .

[50]  C F Colebrook,et al.  TURBULENT FLOW IN PIPES, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE TRANSITION REGION BETWEEN THE SMOOTH AND ROUGH PIPE LAWS. , 1939 .

[51]  Vincenzo Armenio,et al.  The effect of the slope of irregularly distributed roughness elements on turbulent wall-bounded flows , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[52]  J. Eaton,et al.  Reynolds-number scaling of the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[53]  Maxim Candries,et al.  DRAG, BOUNDARY-LAYER AND ROUGHNESS CHARACTERISTICS OF MARINE SURFACES COATED WITH ANTIFOULINGS , 2001 .

[54]  David J. Whitehouse,et al.  Surfaces and their Measurement , 2002 .