A framework for group decision support systems: An application in the evaluation of information technology for logistics firms

Abstract The objective of this research is to propose a framework to enable decision-makers to achieve an overall consensus by using a group decision support system in the evaluation of information technology. The framework consists of a series of steps beginning with individual rankings of criteria by applying the analytic network process (ANP), through to a consensus ranking by utilising Delphi and Maximise Agreement Heuristic (MAH) methods. The contribution of this research lies in the methodology for integrating ANP, Delphi and MAH in order to perform quantitative and qualitative analysis in-depth to achieve the overall consensus ranking in association with a programme developed by the authors. The model assessment and its limitations using five logistics firms in Thailand are also presented.

[1]  A. Kengpol Design of a decision support system to evaluate the investment in a new distribution centre , 2004 .

[2]  James L. McKenney,et al.  Management decision systems : computer-based support for decision making , 1971 .

[3]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[4]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Athakorn Kengpol Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in Small to Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Study of Obstacles in Implementing QFD in Thailand , 2004 .

[6]  Hannu Kivijärvi,et al.  Logistics management: a method for evaluation of production-distribution investments , 1991 .

[7]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  H. G. Sol,et al.  Decision support systems: Issues and challenges: Göran FICK and Ralph H. SPRAGUE Jr. (Eds.) Proceedings of an International Task Force Meeting, June 23–25, 1980, Pergamon, Oxford, 1980, viii + 189 pages, £12.50 , 1981 .

[9]  Benjamin W. Lin,et al.  Some heuristics for the consensus ranking problem , 1983, Comput. Oper. Res..

[10]  William E. Souder,et al.  Comparative Analysis of R&D Investment Models , 1972 .

[11]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[12]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Information systems : a problem-solving approach , 1995 .

[13]  M. Tuominen,et al.  Group decision support systems in industrial customer need assessment , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[14]  Markku Tuominen,et al.  A decision aid in warehouse site selection , 1996 .

[15]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  A decision support system for selection and justification of advanced manufacturing technologies , 1997 .

[16]  Athakorn Kengpol,et al.  The development of a decision support tool for the selection of advanced technology to achieve rapid product development , 2001 .

[17]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using the analytical network process , 1998 .

[18]  P. C. Pandey,et al.  Selection of an automated inspection system using multiattribute decision analysis , 1995 .

[19]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A Group Decision Support Framework for Consensus Ranking of Technical Manager Candidates , 1996 .

[20]  Neil R. Baker,et al.  R&D Project Selection Models: An Assessment , 1974, R&D Management.

[21]  James R. Freeland,et al.  Recent Advances in R&D Benefit Measurement and Project Selection Methods : Management Science , 1975 .

[22]  Kalevi Kyläheiko,et al.  An analytic approach to production capacity allocation and supply chain design , 2002 .

[23]  Lloyd G. Williams,et al.  Technology Selection: An Educational Approach , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[24]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[25]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[26]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  The analytic network process in energy policy planning , 1986 .

[27]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  Decision Support for Management , 1995 .

[28]  Petteri Piippo,et al.  Use of GDSS for technology selection: new integrated CAD-system for an entire company , 1999, PICMET '99: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol-1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.99CH36310).

[29]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  Kimbroe J. Carter,et al.  Analysis of Three Decision-making Methods , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[31]  Vicki L. Sauter,et al.  Decision Support Systems: An Applied Managerial Approach , 1996 .

[32]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .