Minimum ten-year results of a prospective randomised study of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the knee.

Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and mosaicplasty are methods of treating symptomatic articular cartilage defects in the knee. This study represents the first long-term randomised comparison of the two techniques in 100 patients at a minimum follow-up of ten years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 31.3 years (16 to 49); the mean duration of symptoms pre-operatively was 7.2 years (9 months to 20 years). The lesions were large with the mean size for the ACI group being 440.9 mm(2) (100 to 1050) and the mosaicplasty group being 399.6 mm(2) (100 to 2000). Patients had a mean of 1.5 previous operations (0 to 4) to the articular cartilage defect. Patients were assessed using the modified Cincinnati knee score and the Stanmore-Bentley Functional Rating system. The number of patients whose repair had failed at ten years was ten of 58 (17%) in the ACI group and 23 of 42 (55%) in the mosaicplasty group (p < 0.001). The functional outcome of those patients with a surviving graft was significantly better in patients who underwent ACI compared with mosaicplasty (p = 0.02).

[1]  C. Probst,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Joint Preservation in Patients with Early Osteoarthritis , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  H. J. Mankin,et al.  Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Articular Cartilage. Part II: Degeneration and Osteoarthrosis, Repair, Regeneration, and Transplantation*† , 1997 .

[3]  L. Hangody,et al.  Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: application in clinical practice. , 1998, Orthopedics.

[4]  A. G. Cobb,et al.  Treatment of painful articular cartilage defects of the patella by carbon-fibre implants , 1998 .

[5]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  Thomas D Brown,et al.  Joint injury, repair, and remodeling: roles in post-traumatic osteoarthritis. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  G. Bentley,et al.  A correlation between the timing of biopsy after autologous chondrocyte implantation and the histological appearance. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  A. Gomoll,et al.  Increased Failure Rate of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation after Previous Treatment with Marrow Stimulation Techniques , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  B. Cole,et al.  Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation in athletes. , 2010, Clinics in sports medicine.

[10]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Two- to 9-Year Outcome After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  G. Bentley,et al.  A prospective, randomised comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  F R Noyes,et al.  A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.