Robust control of the safety factor profile and stored energy evolutions in high performance burning plasma scenarios in the ITER tokamak

The next step towards the development of a nuclear fusion tokamak power plant is the ITER project. Integrated closed-loop control of the plasma stored energy and safety factor profile (q-profile) is key to maintaining the plasma in a stable state and maximizing its performance. The q-profile evolution in tokamaks is related to the poloidal magnetic flux profile evolution, which is described by a physics model called the magnetic diffusion equation. A first-principles-driven (FPD), nonlinear, control-oriented model of the poloidal magnetic flux profile evolution is obtained by first combining the magnetic diffusion equation with simplified physics-based models of the noninductive current-drives. Secondly, the electron density, electron temperature, and plasma resistivity profiles are modeled as uncertain parameters by defining ranges in which they are expected to be in typical ITER high performance scenarios. This FPD model is then employed to synthesize an H∞ feedback algorithm that utilizes ITER's auxiliary heating/current-drive sources and the total plasma current as actuators to control the q-profile and stored energy in high performance burning plasma scenarios while ensuring the closed-loop system is robust to the uncertainties in the plasma parameters. Finally, the effectiveness of the controller is demonstrated through simulation.

[1]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Backstepping control of the plasma current profile in the DIII-D tokamak , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[2]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Towards model-based current profile control at DIII-D , 2007 .

[3]  Mazen Alamir,et al.  Bootstrap current optimization in Tokamaks using sum-of-squares polynomials , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[4]  Yury Orlov,et al.  Sliding mode stabilization of the current profile in Tokamak plasmas , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[5]  S. Malang,et al.  Fusion Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[6]  D. J. Campbell,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 1999 .

[7]  T.K. Fowler,et al.  Nuclear fusion , 1989, IEEE Potentials.

[8]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[9]  J. B. Lister,et al.  Full tokamak discharge simulation of ITER by combining DINA-CH and CRONOS , 2009 .

[10]  Didier Georges,et al.  Model-based control of the magnetic flux profile in a Tokamak plasma , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[11]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  Optimal steady-state control for linear non-right-invertible systems , 2007 .

[12]  S. H. Kim,et al.  A potentially robust plasma profile control approach for ITER using real-time estimation of linearized profile response models , 2012 .

[13]  A. G. Peeters,et al.  The bootstrap current and its consequences , 2000 .

[14]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Physics-based control-oriented modeling of the safety factor profile dynamics in high performance tokamak plasmas , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[15]  F. Hinton,et al.  Theory of plasma transport in toroidal confinement systems , 1976 .

[16]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Toroidal current profile control during low confinement mode plasma discharges in DIII-D via first-principles-driven model-based robust control synthesis , 2012 .

[17]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  First-principles-driven model-based current profile control for the DIII-D tokamak via LQI optimal control , 2013 .