Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES It is generally assumed that delayed diagnosis of acute appendicitis results in higher morbidity but this assumption is not strongly supported in the literature. We attempt to define the effect of patient and physician delay on the outcome of patients with acute appendicitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We studied 486 patients admitted between 1980 and 1992. Patient delay in presenting to a physician and surgeon delay from hospital admission to operation were studied in relation to stage of disease at operation as well as to postoperative complications. RESULTS Postoperative complications occurred in 10% of cases with simple acute appendicitis versus about 20% of cases with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (P <0.001). The mean patient delay from onset of symptoms to presentation to a physician was 1.7 days in simple acute appendicitis versus 2.3 days in gangrenous or perforated appendicitis (P <0.001). Mean surgeon delay was 13.6 hours in simple acute appendicitis versus 14.5 hours in advanced appendicitis (P = NS). CONCLUSION Delay in patient presentation adversely affects the stage of disease in acute appendicitis and leads to increased incidence of infectious complications and to prolonged hospital stay. Conversely, physician delay does not affect the stage of disease. A surgeon's decision to observe patients in hospital in order to clarify the diagnosis is justified, as it does not adversely affect outcome.

[1]  D. Cooney,et al.  The avoidable excesses in the management of perforated appendicitis in children. , 1986, Journal of pediatric surgery.

[2]  F. Lewis,et al.  Appendicitis. A critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1,000 cases. , 1975, Archives of surgery.

[3]  R. Malt,et al.  Appendicitis Near Its Centenary , 1984, Annals of surgery.

[4]  Zuidema Gd,et al.  Reasons for delay of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. , 1984 .

[5]  Hunter Ic,et al.  Deaths from acute appendicitis: a review of twenty-one cases in Scotland from 1974 to 1979. , 1986 .

[6]  The consequences of current constraints on surgical treatment of appendicitis. , 1989, American journal of surgery.

[7]  S. Noori,et al.  Acute appendicitis--the University Hospital experience. , 1993, The Medical journal of Malaysia.

[8]  Scher Ks,et al.  The continuing challenge of perforating appendicitis. , 1980 .

[9]  J. Haller,et al.  Intensive in-hospital observation: a safe way to decrease unnecessary appendectomy. , 1975, The American surgeon.

[10]  P. Näsman,et al.  Acute appendicitis: a clinical study of 1018 cases of emergency appendectomy. , 1982, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[11]  D. Drake Acute Abdominal Pain in Children , 1980, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[12]  D. Dombal Diagnosis of Acute Abdominal Pain , 1954 .

[13]  D. Dudgeon,et al.  Perforated appendicitis: current experience in a Childrens Hospital. , 1977, Annals of surgery.

[14]  S. Karch,et al.  The influence of gender and use of barium enema on morbidity in acute appendicitis. , 1989, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[15]  P. Peltokallio,et al.  Evolution of the age distribution and mortality of acute appendicitis. , 1981, Archives of surgery.

[16]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Factors affecting perforation in acute appendicitis. , 1981, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[17]  B. Bjerregaard,et al.  Acute appendicitis. Prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications. , 1981, American journal of surgery.

[18]  R. Burns,et al.  Appendicitis in Mature Patients , 1985, Annals of surgery.

[19]  H. Thomson,et al.  Active observation in acute abdominal pain. , 1986, American journal of surgery.