A nonlinear ultrasonic hybrid modulation subtraction method for structural health monitoring using sparse arrays

Structural health monitoring (SHM) of components is becoming an important part of maintenance and component evaluation throughout many engineering industries. Evaluation of defects and damage plays an important role in reducing maintenance and testing costs, and thus has become an important part of the costs of businesses. In this work a nonlinear ultrasound subtraction techniques is proposed which looks to evaluate barely visible impact damage (BVID) in a composite structure using a sparse array of piezoelectric transducers. Evaluation of the elastic responses of composite structures can become difficult due to the complexity of these types of structures, with variations is attenuation, dispersion and fibre orientation. The method proposed looks to simplify damage detection without the calculation of time-of-arrival (TOA), dispersion curves and the frequency dependence of damage. The method relies on the excitation of the structure with three separate signals at both 0° and 180° degree phases. The three signals used are a single frequency, swept frequency and combination of both. The novelty of the method relies on a delay which is added between the signals, this delay is used to promote nonlinear ultrasonic interactions within the material. A hybrid modulation subtraction (HMS) method is then used to filter out linear components and retain the nonlinear modulated components in the signal. A sparse array of transducers and sensors are used to investigate a region with barely visible impact damage. The method does not rely on the a priori knowledge of wave velocity or the dispersion curves. The results show that it is possible to identify the defect region using the modulated nonlinear responses of the structure.

[1]  Michele Meo,et al.  IWSHM 2017: Structural health monitoring of the loosening in a multi-bolt structure using linear and modulated nonlinear ultrasound acoustic moments approach , 2018, Structural Health Monitoring.

[2]  Steven Delrue,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Guided Wave Imaging of Impact Damage in CFRP Using a Probabilistic Approach , 2016, Materials.

[3]  Mariano Ruiz,et al.  Damage Detection and Characterization in Composites Using a Geometric Modification of the RAPID Algorithm , 2020, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[4]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  An Advanced Multi-Sensor Acousto-Ultrasonic Structural Health Monitoring System: Development and Aerospace Demonstration , 2017, Materials.

[5]  F. Ciampa,et al.  Nonlinear elastic multi‐path reciprocal method for damage localisation in composite materials , 2018, Ultrasonics.

[6]  William T. Yost,et al.  Nonlinear ultrasonic characterization of fatigue microstructures , 2001 .

[7]  Michele Meo,et al.  Residual fatigue life estimation using a nonlinear ultrasound modulation method , 2015 .

[8]  Antonio Gliozzi,et al.  A scaling method to enhance detection of a nonlinear elastic response , 2008 .

[9]  Chun H. Wang,et al.  A synthetic time-reversal imaging method for structural health monitoring , 2004 .

[10]  J. Michaels Detection, localization and characterization of damage in plates with an in situ array of spatially distributed ultrasonic sensors , 2008 .

[11]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Defect detection, localization and growth monitoring , 2007 .

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Francesco Ciampa,et al.  Phase symmetry analysis for nonlinear ultrasonic modulated signals , 2020, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.