Digital tomosynthesis mammography using a parallel maximum-likelihood reconstruction method

A parallel reconstruction method, based on an iterative maximum likelihood (ML) algorithm, is developed to provide fast reconstruction for digital tomosynthesis mammography. Tomosynthesis mammography acquires 11 low-dose projections of a breast by moving an x-ray tube over a 50° angular range. In parallel reconstruction, each projection is divided into multiple segments along the chest-to-nipple direction. Using the 11 projections, segments located at the same distance from the chest wall are combined to compute a partial reconstruction of the total breast volume. The shape of the partial reconstruction forms a thin slab, angled toward the x-ray source at a projection angle 0°. The reconstruction of the total breast volume is obtained by merging the partial reconstructions. The overlap region between neighboring partial reconstructions and neighboring projection segments is utilized to compensate for the incomplete data at the boundary locations present in the partial reconstructions. A serial execution of the reconstruction is compared to a parallel implementation, using clinical data. The serial code was run on a PC with a single PentiumIV 2.2GHz CPU. The parallel implementation was developed using MPI and run on a 64-node Linux cluster using 800MHz Itanium CPUs. The serial reconstruction for a medium-sized breast (5cm thickness, 11cm chest-to-nipple distance) takes 115 minutes, while a parallel implementation takes only 3.5 minutes. The reconstruction time for a larger breast using a serial implementation takes 187 minutes, while a parallel implementation takes 6.5 minutes. No significant differences were observed between the reconstructions produced by the serial and parallel implementations.

[1]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[2]  N. Pelc,et al.  Filtered backprojection for modifying the impulse response of circular tomosynthesis. , 2001, Medical physics.

[3]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  D. G. Grant Tomosynthesis: a three-dimensional radiographic imaging technique. , 1972, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[6]  L. Desbat,et al.  An adapted fan volume sampling scheme for 3D algebraic reconstruction in linear tomosynthesis , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[7]  A. Wilson,et al.  Breast imaging, 2nd edn , 1998 .

[8]  Günter Lauritsch,et al.  Theoretical framework for filtered back projection in tomosynthesis , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[9]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[10]  James T. Dobbins,et al.  Applications of matrix inverse tomosynthesis , 2000 .

[11]  Hiroshi Matsuo,et al.  Three-dimensional image reconstruction by digital tomo-synthesis using inverse filtering , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  James T. Dobbins,et al.  Optimization of matrix inverse tomosynthesis , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[14]  P. Bleuet,et al.  An adapted fan volume sampling scheme for 3-D algebraic reconstruction in linear tomosynthesis , 2001 .