Chapter 5 – ADAPTATION AND TRANSMITTER GATING IN VERTEBRATE PHOTORECEPTORS

A quantitative model for the transduction dynamics whereby intracellular transmitter in a vertebrate cone mediates between light input and voltage output is analysed. A basic postulate is that the transmitter acts to multiplicatively gate the effects of light before the gated signal ever influences the cone potential. This postulate does not appear in the Baylor, Hodgkin, and Lamb (BHL) model of cone dynamics. One consequence of this difference is that a single dynamic equation from our model can quantitatively fit turtle cone data better than the full BHL theory. The gating concept also permits conceptually simple explanations of many phenomena whose explanations using the BHL unblocking concept are much more complex. Predictions are suggested to further distinguish the two theories. Our transmitter laws also form a minimal model for an unbiased miniaturized transduction scheme which can be realized by a depletable transmitter. Thus our theory allows us to consider more general issues. Can one find an optimal transmitter design of which the photoreceptor transmitter is a special case? Does the cone transmitter obey laws that are shared by transmitters in other neural systems, with which the photoreceptors can be compared and contrasted to distinguish its specialized design features from its generally shared features?

[1]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Visual Adaptation in Monkey Cones: Recordings of Late Receptor Potentials , 1970, Science.

[2]  S. Grossberg.  Behavioral Contrast in Short Term Memory: Serial Binary Memory Models or Parallel Continuous Memory Models? , 1978 .

[3]  S. Grossberg.  How does a brain build a cognitive code , 1980 .

[4]  J. C. Low,et al.  Changes in pigeon cone photocurrent caused by reduction in extracellular calcium activity. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Simo Hemilä,et al.  An analysis of rod outer segment adaptation based on a simple equivalent circuit , 1978, Biophysics of structure and mechanism.

[7]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The electrical response of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Changes in time scale and sensitivity in turtle photoreceptors , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  S. Grossberg.  On the production and release of chemical transmitters and related topics in cellular control. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  S Hemilä.  Background adaptation in the rods of the frog's retina. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  S. Hemilä,et al.  Dark‐adaptation in frog rods: changes in the stimulus‐response function. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  John E. Dowling,et al.  Adaptation in Skate Photoreceptors , 1972, The Journal of general physiology.

[13]  F. Werblin,et al.  Control of Retinal Sensitivity: I. Light and Dark Adaptation of Vertebrate Rods and Cones , 1974 .

[14]  W L Pak,et al.  Adaptation in Retinal Rods of Axolotl: Intracellular Recordings , 1972, Science.

[15]  H Ripps,et al.  S-Potentials in the Skate Retina , 1971, The Journal of general physiology.

[16]  J. Dowling,et al.  Intracellular recordings from gecko photoreceptors during light and dark adaptation , 1975, The Journal of general physiology.