Needlescopic hysterectomy: incorporation of 3-mm instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy

BackgroundProgression to needlescopic techniques for advanced gynecologic procedures currently performed with conventional laparoscopy still is in its infancy, and published series are currently lacking in the gynecologic literature. This study aimed to report initial experience with incorporating needlescopic instruments in the performance of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).MethodsThe study group consisted of 32 consecutive women undergoing needlescopic hysterectomy. The control group included 54 women who underwent conventional TLH over the preceding 12-month period and met the same inclusion criteria as the study group. Conventional TLH was performed using 5-mm working ports and a 10-mm laparoscope. The needlescopic hysterectomy differed from the conventional laparoscopic procedure in that 3-mm working ports were used as well as a 3- or 5-mm laparoscope at the umbilicus. Otherwise, the trocar layout and surgical technique were identical. Parameters of technical feasibility (operating time, estimated blood loss, perioperative complications) were considered major statistical end points.ResultsIn the study group, all but one procedure were performed successfully using the needlescopic approach. One patient in the needlescopic group required conversion to standard TLH because of uncontrollable bleeding from the uterine artery. The operative time and estimated blood loss of needlescopic hysterectomy were comparable with those of standard TLH. No significant complication occurred in either group.ConclusionsFor properly selected patients, the needlescopic technique can be applied to TLH safely and effectively.

[1]  George Berci,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine-caliber instruments , 1998, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  F. Ghezzi,et al.  Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial. , 2006, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[3]  P. Wei,et al.  Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[4]  F. Ghezzi,et al.  Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial. , 2005, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[5]  Y. Novitsky,et al.  Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[6]  J. Paulson,et al.  A New Technique for Performing a Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Using Microlaparoscopy: Microlaparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (mLAVH) , 2000, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[7]  C. Kum,et al.  Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  C. Low,et al.  Post-operative pain in needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial. , 2001, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[9]  J. Müller,et al.  Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic vs microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[10]  A. García-Ruiz,et al.  Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. , 1998, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[11]  G. Berci Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine-caliber instruments. Smaller is not necessarily better. , 1998, Surgical endoscopy.

[12]  J. Rosenberg,et al.  Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. , 2002, Surgical endoscopy.

[13]  J. Rosenberg,et al.  Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  E C Poulin,et al.  Needlescopic surgery. A logical evolution from conventional laparoscopic surgery. , 2001, Surgical endoscopy.

[15]  M. Canis,et al.  Minilaparoscopic hysterectomy. , 1999, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[16]  J. Rosenberg,et al.  Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind controlled study. , 2000, Surgical endoscopy.

[17]  A. Alponat,et al.  Is minisite cholecystectomy less traumatic? Prospective randomized study comparing minisite and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomies , 2002, World Journal of Surgery.