Spatial distribution of motile phytoplankton in a stratified reservoir: the physical controls on patch formation

Changes in the spatial distribution of the dinoflagellate Ceratium hirundinella were observed in a stratified, medium-sized (16 km 2 ) Argentinean reservoir over several days. A fluorescence profiling technique was used to identify persistent patchiness in the distribution of the dinoflagellate. A three-dimensional numerical model was used to reconcile a range of different unsteady processes and prove that the initial source of heterogeneity in the system was the vertical migration of Ceratium. Once migration established vertical heterogeneity, the dominant influence on the patch dynamics alternated between control by migration and control by mixing and transport. This led to the development of persistent horizontal patchiness. The analysis revealed that the region of the lake inhabited by Ceratium was highly predictable and from this result it was determined that physical processes (with some influence from migration) control the habitat of this dinoflagellate rather than biological/chemical gradients. When the spatial habitat of a particular phytoplankton species can be isolated in this manner, the resources available to the species can be more accurately determined by further study. The results are particularly applicable to the study of motile/buoyant plankton in aquatic systems that are periodically subject to moderate or strong wind forcing events.

[1]  P. Richerson,et al.  The relationship of environmental variability to the spatial patterns of phytoplankton biomass in Lake Tahoe , 1982 .

[2]  J. Imberger,et al.  Reducing Numerical diffusion effects with pycnocline filter , 2003 .

[3]  C. Reynolds.  Succession and Vertical Distribution of Phytoplankton in Response to Thermal Stratification in a Lowland Mere, with Special Reference to Nutrient Availability , 1976 .

[4]  D. G. George,et al.  The effect of wind on the distribution of chlorophyll a and crustacean plankton in a shallow eutrophic reservoir , 1976 .

[5]  R. T. Cheng,et al.  SEMI-IMPLICIT FINITE DIFFERENCE METHODS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL SHALLOW WATER FLOW , 1992 .

[6]  A. Ōkubo.  SOME SPECULATIONS ON OCEANIC DIFFUSION DIAGRAMS. , 1972 .

[7]  C. Reynolds.  Relationships among the biological properties, distribution and regulation of production by planktonic cyanobacteria , 1989 .

[8]  Sidney Leibovich,et al.  The form and Dynamics of Langmuir Circulations , 1983 .

[9]  S. Heaney,et al.  Physiological and environmental constraints in the ecology of the planktonic dinoflagellate Ceratium hirundinella , 1979 .

[10]  Stephen G. Monismith,et al.  Convective motions in the sidearm of a small reservoir , 1990 .

[11]  Jörg Imberger,et al.  A DYNAMIC RESERVOIR SIMULATION MODEL - DYRESM: 5 , 1981 .

[12]  C. Reynolds.  The Ecology of Phytoplankton , 2006 .

[13]  Ian T. Webster,et al.  Effect of wind on the distribution of phytoplankton cells in lakes , 1990 .

[14]  D. G. George,et al.  Factors Influencing the Spatial Distribution of Phytoplankton in a Small Productive Lake , 1978 .

[15]  F. Dujardin.  Histoire naturelle des zoophytes : infusoires comprenant la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux, et la maniere de les etudier a l'aide du microscope , 1841 .

[16]  R. Crawford,et al.  THE MORPHOLOGY AND FINE STRUCTURE OF CERATIUM HIRUNDINELLA (DINOPHYCEAE) 1 , 1970 .

[17]  J. Talling.  The underwater light climate as a controlling factor in the production ecology of freshwater phytoplankton: With 14 figures in the text and on 1 folder , 1971 .

[18]  H. Paerl.  Nuisance phytoplankton blooms in coastal, estuarine, and inland waters1 , 1988 .

[19]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  The Balance of Nature and Human Impact: The paradox of the plankton , 2013 .

[20]  J. Huisman,et al.  How Do Sinking Phytoplankton Species Manage to Persist? , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[21]  H. Dau,et al.  A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ , 2004, Photosynthesis Research.

[22]  R. Stocker,et al.  Horizontal transport and dispersion in the surface layer of a medium-sized lake , 2003 .

[23]  S. Heaney.  Temporal and spatial distribution of the dinoflagellate Ceratium hirundinella O. F. Muller within a small productive lake , 1976 .

[24]  P J Richerson,et al.  Spatial Scales of Current Speed and Phytoplankton Biomass Fluctuations in Lake Tahoe , 1975, Science.

[25]  J. Imberger,et al.  Matching Temperature and Conductivity Sensor Response Characteristics , 1985 .

[26]  P. Richerson,et al.  Contemporaneous disequilibrium, a new hypothesis to explain the "paradox of the plankton". , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  K. Denman,et al.  Spectral Analysis in Ecology , 1975 .

[28]  R. Oliver,et al.  Growth of Ceratium hirundinella in a subtropical Australian reservoir: the role of vertical migration , 2000 .

[29]  D. E. Whitney,et al.  The influence of water motion on the distribution and transport of materials in a salt marsh estuary1 , 1983 .

[30]  S. Heaney,et al.  The role of the cyst stage in the seasonal growth of the dinoflagellate Ceratium hirundinella within a small productive lake , 1983 .

[31]  J. Verhagen.  Modeling phytoplankton patchiness under the influence of wind-driven currents inlakes , 1994 .