An original design approach for stimulating the ideation of new product features

An analysis of the computer-aided tools supporting idea generation in product planning has been performed.The main lacks of the available tools have been identified.A new approach has been developed for supporting the identification of valuable product features.The tool has been tested through experiments in academia and industry.Experiments show the capability of the tool to enhance quantity and novelty of ideas. The manuscript illustrates a method, implemented in a computer application, which supports the identification of new product features in the early phases of engineering design cycles. In the practice, such a task is commonly carried out through cognitive techniques that generate random and unstructured stimuli. These approaches and the computer-aided tools that implement them suffer from a scarce exploration of the design space. This criticality is faced by introducing an original classification of value drivers, thus organizing a large set of concepts consisting of stimuli for generating new product ideas. The proposed method combines the concepts belonging to different categories of the classification in order to identify scenarios in which the product can provide unprecedented benefits for customers and other stakeholders. Experiments in academia and industry show the capability of the developed method and prototype software to increase the number and the novelty of ideas, reveal previously overlooked drivers for customer satisfaction and enhance the definition of stimulated design requirements.

[1]  Bella Martin,et al.  Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions , 2012 .

[2]  Todd Lubart,et al.  How can computers be partners in the creative process: Classification and commentary on the Special Issue , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  How To Use Analogies For Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[4]  Andrew A. West,et al.  A framework of web-based conceptual design , 2003, Comput. Ind..

[5]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 1992 .

[6]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[7]  Yong Zeng,et al.  A Theoretical Model of Design Creativity: Nonlinear Design Dynamics and Mental Stress-Creativity Relation , 2012, J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci..

[8]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[9]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Implementing life cycle assessment in product development , 2003 .

[11]  Tomohiko Sakao,et al.  Towards Consolidation on Product-Service Systems Design , 2012 .

[12]  H. Krcmar,et al.  Community Engineering for Innovations: The Ideas Competition as a Method to Nurture a Virtual Community for Innovations , 2009 .

[13]  Hao Jiang,et al.  Design cognition differences when using unstructured, partially structured, and structured concept generation creativity techniques , 2013 .

[14]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[15]  Janet Davis Generating Directions for Persuasive Technology Design with the Inspiration Card Workshop , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[16]  W. Gordon Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity , 1961 .

[17]  Hei-Kuang Lee,et al.  A proposed process for systematic innovation , 2011 .

[18]  Kenneth B. Kahn Product Planning Essentials , 2000 .

[19]  B. Skiera,et al.  Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets , 2012 .

[20]  Horst Geschka Creativity techniques in Germany , 1996 .

[21]  Francesca Montagna,et al.  Situating needs and requirements in the FBS framework , 2013 .

[22]  Ji-Hyung Park,et al.  A systematic framework for evaluating design concepts of a new product , 2010 .

[23]  Joris S. M. Vergeest,et al.  New functionality for computer-aided conceptual design: the displacement feature , 1998 .

[24]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Functional Interdependence and Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs , 1999 .

[25]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Environment-Based formulation of Design Problem , 2004, Trans. SDPS.

[26]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[27]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[28]  Gerald F. Smith Idea‐Generation Techniques: A Formulary of Active Ingredients , 1998 .

[29]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Information Systems as a Reference Discipline for New Product Development , 2003, MIS Q..

[30]  J. Aurich,et al.  How to design and offer services successfully , 2010 .

[31]  Bruno Lotter,et al.  Manufacturing Assembly Handbook , 1990 .

[32]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Electronic brainstorming in small and large groups , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas , 2005, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[34]  Todd Lubart,et al.  Multidimensional Approach to Detecting Creative Potential in Managers , 2012 .

[35]  Arthur B. VanGundy,et al.  BRAIN WRITING FOR NEW PRODUCT IDEAS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO BRAINSTORMING , 1984 .

[36]  Wei Yan,et al.  An in-process customer utility prediction system for product conceptualisation , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[37]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  REQUIREMENTS CAPTURE FOR MEDICAL DEVICE DESIGN , 2003 .

[38]  Eric F. Rietzschel,et al.  Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. , 2006 .

[39]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[40]  Andreas B. Eisingerich,et al.  How can clusters sustain performance? The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty , 2010 .

[41]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[43]  Edward De Bono New think : the use of lateral thinking in the generation of new ideas , 1968 .

[44]  Dijana Močnik,et al.  Achieving Increased Value for Customers Through Mutual Understanding Between Business and Information System Communities , 2010 .

[45]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Re-engineering of Products and Processes: How to Achieve Global Success in the Changing Marketplace , 2012 .

[46]  U. Lindemann,et al.  LIFECYCLE AND STAKEHOLDER-ORIENTED INTEGRATION OF COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS INTO PRODUCT CONCEPTS , 2014 .

[47]  A. Maslow A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[48]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  A systematic approach to eco-innovative product design based on life cycle planning , 2006, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[49]  Trevor Sowrey,et al.  Idea Generation: Identifying the Most Useful Techniques , 1990 .

[50]  J. Johansson,et al.  Product planning at an Electrolux subsidiary , 1998, IEMC '98 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Pioneering New Technologies: Management Issues and Challenges in the Third Millennium (Cat. No.98CH36266).

[51]  Nigel Coates,et al.  Idea generation techniques in an industrial market , 1997 .

[52]  Petri Parvinen,et al.  An Exploratory Empirical Verification of Blue Ocean Strategies: Findings from Sales Strategy , 2008 .

[53]  Jelena Spanjol,et al.  How Many and What Kind? The Role of Strategic Orientation in New Product Ideation , 2009 .

[54]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation , 2010 .

[55]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[56]  J. Crisp,et al.  The Delphi method? , 1997, Nursing research.

[57]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Inspiration card workshops , 2006, DIS '06.

[58]  Francis Eng Hock Tay,et al.  Product modeling for conceptual design support , 2002, Comput. Ind..

[59]  Denis Cavallucci,et al.  A research agenda for computing developments associated with innovation pipelines , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[60]  Yong Zeng,et al.  A physiological study of relationship between designer's mental effort and mental stress during conceptual design , 2014, Comput. Aided Des..

[61]  L. H. Shu,et al.  Using descriptions of biological phenomena for idea generation , 2008 .

[62]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Modality and representation in analogy , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[63]  E. Bono Six Thinking Hats , 1985 .

[64]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[65]  Federico Rotini,et al.  A CAD tool to support idea generation in the product planning phase , 2015 .

[66]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2009 .

[67]  E. Bono Lateral thinking: Creativity Step by Step , 1970 .

[68]  Barry M. Kudrowitz,et al.  When Does a Paper Clip Become a Sundial? Exploring the Progression of Originality in the Alternative Uses Test , 2013, J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci..

[69]  S. Beatty,et al.  Alternative Measurement Approaches to Consumer Values: The List of Values (LOV) and Values and Life Style (VALS) , 1986 .

[70]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .

[71]  Thomas P. Walter,et al.  Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems ( MCIS ) 2011 TOWARDS MEASURING CROWDSOURCING SUCCESS : AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL FACTORS IN ONLINE IDEA CONTEST , 2017 .

[72]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective , 2010 .

[73]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Understanding contexts by being there: case studies in bodystorming , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[74]  Joost R. Duflou,et al.  Identifying candidates for design-by-analogy , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[75]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  A framework for user experience, needs and affordances , 2014 .

[76]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods , 2012 .

[77]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  Computer-Aided Requirement Management for Product Definition: A Methodology and Implementation , 1998 .

[78]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Overview of methods supporting product planning: Open research issues , 2013 .

[79]  N. Kano,et al.  Upsizing the organization by attractive quality creation , 1995 .

[80]  Linda Rochford,et al.  Generating and screening new products ideas , 1991 .

[81]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design , 2011 .

[82]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The effects of biological examples in idea generation , 2010 .

[83]  Barry Buzan,et al.  The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain's Untapped Potential , 1994 .

[84]  Federico Rotini,et al.  Supporting product design by anticipating the success chances of new value profiles , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[85]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[86]  Adrian Oriţǎ,et al.  Use of Ontological Classes in the Exploration of User Needs , 2013 .

[87]  Stefan Kohn,et al.  Computer aided innovation - State of the art from a new product development perspective , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[88]  Sofia Börjesson,et al.  Innovative scanning experiences from an idea generation project at Volvo Cars , 2006 .

[89]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[90]  Altshuller Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[91]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design , 2008 .

[92]  Michael Tovey,et al.  Sketching and direct CAD modelling in automotive design , 2000 .

[93]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies , 2010 .

[94]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  A computational framework for authoring and searching product design specifications , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[95]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  A Step Beyond to Overcome Design Fixation: A Design-by-Analogy Approach , 2015 .

[96]  Kathy K. Franklin,et al.  Idea Generation and Exploration: Benefits and Limitations of the Policy Delphi Research Method , 2006 .

[97]  Olivier Toubia Idea Generation, Creativity, and Incentives , 2006 .

[98]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  The Brainstorming Myth , 2000 .

[99]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Software Tools for New Product Development , 1997 .

[100]  Renée Mauborgne,et al.  Blue ocean strategy. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[101]  Francesca Montagna,et al.  Multi-stakeholder analysis of requirements to design real innovations , 2013 .

[102]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval , 2001 .

[103]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[104]  Belinda López-Mesa,et al.  Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams , 2011 .

[105]  Volker Bilgram Performance Assessment of Co-creation Initiatives: A Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Value of Idea Contests , 2013 .

[106]  Yong Zeng,et al.  Classification of Product Requirements Based on Product Environment , 2006, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[107]  Yan Li,et al.  Design creativity in product innovation , 2007 .

[108]  Gül E. Okudan,et al.  Integrating systematic creativity into first-year engineering design curriculum , 2006 .