Automatic extraction of anatomical landmarks from medical image data: An evaluation of different methods

This work presents three different methods for automatic detection of anatomical landmarks in CT data, namely for the left and right anterior superior iliac spines and the pubic symphysis. The methods exhibit different degrees of generality in terms of portability to other anatomical landmarks and require a different amount of training data. The first method is problem-specific and is based on the convex hull of the pelvis. Method two is a more generic approach based on a statistical shape model including the landmarks of interest for every training shape. With our third method we present the most generic approach, where only a small set of training landmarks is required. Those landmarks are transferred to the patient specific geometry based on Mean Value Coordinates (MVCs). The methods work on surfaces of the pelvis that need to be extracted beforehand. We perform this geometry reconstruction with our previously introduced fully automatic segmentation framework for the pelvic bones. With a focus on the accuracy of our novel MVC-based approach, we evaluate and compare our methods on 100 clinical CT datasets, for which gold standard landmarks were defined manually by multiple observers.

[1]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Pelvic Bones from CT Data Based on a Statistical Shape Model , 2008, VCBM.

[3]  M O Heller,et al.  [Musculoskeletal load analysis. A biomechanical explanation for clinical results--and more?]. , 2007, Der Orthopade.

[4]  Martin Reimers,et al.  Mean value coordinates in 3D , 2005, Comput. Aided Geom. Des..

[5]  Margrit Betke,et al.  Landmark detection in the chest and registration of lung surfaces with an application to nodule registration , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Craig E. L. Stark,et al.  Spline-Based Probabilistic Model for Anatomical Landmark Detection , 2006, MICCAI.

[7]  J. Warren,et al.  Mean value coordinates for closed triangular meshes , 2005, SIGGRAPH 2005.

[8]  R. Aspden,et al.  Early identification of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip using an active shape model to quantify changes in bone morphometric features: can hip shape tell us anything about the progression of osteoarthritis? , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Localization of Anatomical Point Landmarks in 3D Medical Images by Fitting 3D Parametric Intensity Models , 2003, IPMI.

[10]  Kun Zhou,et al.  BSGP: bulk-synchronous GPU programming , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[11]  H Handels,et al.  Atlas-based Recognition of Anatomical Structures and Landmarks and the Automatic Computation of Orthopedic Parameters , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[12]  Mark Meyer,et al.  Harmonic coordinates for character articulation , 2007, ACM Trans. Graph..

[13]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Yiqiang Zhan,et al.  Joint detection and localization of multiple anatomical landmarks through learning , 2008, Medical Imaging: Computer-Aided Diagnosis.

[15]  D. Levin,et al.  Green Coordinates , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.