SummaryThe morphologies of two artificial granite joints (sanded and hammered surfaces), one artificial regularly undulated joint and one natural schist joint, were studied. The sanded and hammered granite joints underwent 5 cycles of direct shear under 3 normal stress levels ranging between 0.3–4 MPa. The regularly undulated joint underwent 10 cycles of shear under 6 normal stress levels ranging between 0.5–5 MPa and the natural schist replicas underwent a monotonous shear under 5 normal stress levels ranging between 0.4–2.4 MPa. In order to characterize the morphology of the sheared joints, a laser sensor profilometer was used to perform surface data measurements prior to and after each shear test. Rather than describing the morphology of the joints from the single profiles, our characterization is based on a simultaneous analysis of all the surface profiles. Roughness was viewed as a combination of a primary roughness and a secondary roughness. The surface angularity was quantified by defining its three-dimensional mean angle, θs, and the parameter Z2s. The surface anisotropy and the secondary roughness were respectively quantified by the degree of apparent anisotropy, ka, and the surface relative roughness coefficient, Rs. The surface sinuosity was quantified by the surface tortuosity coefficient, Ts. Comparison between the means of the classical linear parameters and those proposed shows that linear parameters underestimate the morphological characteristics of the joint surfaces. As a result, the proposed bi-dimensional and tri-dimensional parameters better describe the evolution of the joints initial roughness during the course of shearing.
[1]
J. Gurland,et al.
Metallographic characterization of fracture surface profiles on sectioning planes
,
1974
.
[2]
N. Yoshioka,et al.
Elastic properties of contacting surfaces under normal and shear loads: 1. Theory
,
1989
.
[3]
David A Lange,et al.
Relationship between Fracture Surface Roughness and Fracture Behavior of Cement Paste and Mortar
,
1993
.
[4]
Erling Nordlund,et al.
An experimental study on the anisotropy and stress-dependency of the strength and deformability of rock joints
,
1992
.
[5]
Ömer Aydan,et al.
The anisotropy of surface morphology characteristics of rock discontinuities
,
1996
.
[6]
Peter Frykman,et al.
Anisotropy in pore networks analyzed with 2-D autocorrelation (variomaps)
,
1993
.
[7]
S. M. El-Soudani,et al.
Profilometric analysis of fractures
,
1978
.
[8]
Stephen R. Brown,et al.
Closure of random elastic surfaces in contact
,
1985
.
[9]
P. A. Witherspoon,et al.
The dependence of fracture mechanical and fluid flow properties on fracture roughness and sample size
,
1983
.
[10]
Deborah K. Smith,et al.
Robust description of statistically heterogeneous seafloor topography through its slope distribution
,
1990
.
[11]
D. D. Kana,et al.
Interlock/friction model for dynamic shear response in natural jointed rock
,
1996
.
[12]
T. Belem,et al.
Fractal analysis of shear joint roughness
,
1997
.