Evidence for distinct magnitude systems for symbolic and non-symbolic number

Cognitive models of magnitude representation are mostly based on the results of studies that use a magnitude comparison task. These studies show similar distance or ratio effects in symbolic (Arabic numerals) and non-symbolic (dot arrays) variants of the comparison task, suggesting a common abstract magnitude representation system for processing both symbolic and non-symbolic numerosities. Recently, however, it has been questioned whether the comparison task really indexes a magnitude representation. Alternatively, it has been hypothesized that there might be different representations of magnitude: an exact representation for symbolic magnitudes and an approximate representation for non-symbolic numerosities. To address the question whether distinct magnitude systems exist, we used an audio–visual matching paradigm in two experiments to explore the relationship between symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing. In Experiment 1, participants had to match visually and auditory presented numerical stimuli in different formats (digits, number words, dot arrays, tone sequences). In Experiment 2, they were instructed only to match the stimuli after processing the magnitude first. The data of our experiments show different results for non-symbolic and symbolic number and are difficult to reconcile with the existence of one abstract magnitude representation. Rather, they suggest the existence of two different systems for processing magnitude, i.e., an exact symbolic system next to an approximate non-symbolic system.

[1]  Midori Tokita,et al.  How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  T. Verguts,et al.  Dissecting the symbolic distance effect: Comparison and priming effects in numerical and nonnumerical orders , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The Role of Visual Information in Numerosity Estimation , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  C. Gilmore,et al.  Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  Emmy Defever,et al.  Association between basic numerical abilities and mathematics achievement. , 2012, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[6]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  The development of automatic numerosity processing in preschoolers: evidence for numerosity-perceptual interference. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[7]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[8]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[9]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  Emmy Defever,et al.  Task- and age-dependent effects of visual stimulus properties on children's explicit numerosity judgments. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[12]  Mieke Vandewaetere,et al.  What can the same-different task tell us about the development of magnitude representations? , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Numeracy Numeracy , 2022 .

[14]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children's mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[15]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[17]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[18]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Dehaene,et al.  A Magnitude Code Common to Numerosities and Number Symbols in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[20]  F. Restle Speed of Adding and Comparing Numbers. , 1970 .

[21]  Emmy Defever,et al.  The Approximate Number System is not Predictive for Symbolic Number Processing in Kindergarteners , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta-analysis. , 2017, Developmental science.

[23]  T. Verguts,et al.  The origins of the numerical distance effect: The same–different task , 2011 .

[24]  John M. Parkman,et al.  Temporal aspects of digit and letter inequality judgments. , 1971, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[25]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Notation-Dependent and -Independent Representations of Numbers in the Parietal Lobes , 2007, Neuron.

[26]  J. Bulthé,et al.  Format-dependent representations of symbolic and non-symbolic numbers in the human cortex as revealed by multi-voxel pattern analyses , 2014, NeuroImage.

[27]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The numerical distance effect is task dependent , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Domain-specific and domain-general changes in children's development of number comparison. , 2008, Developmental science.

[29]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Evidence against a strong association between numerical symbols and the quantities they represent , 2012, CogSci.

[30]  Hilary Barth,et al.  Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  Human Neuroscience Hypothesis and Theory Article Two Systems of Non-symbolic Numerical Cognition , 2022 .

[33]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Sometimes area counts more than number , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Number and density discrimination rely on a common metric: Similar psychophysical effects of size, contrast, and divided attention. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[35]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Orthographic dependency in the neural correlates of reading: Evidence from audiovisual integration in English readers , 2013 .

[36]  Dale J Cohen,et al.  Integers do not automatically activate their quantity representation , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[38]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. , 1994, Psychological review.

[39]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Mental representations of social status , 2004, Cognition.

[40]  Les Staves About number sense , 2018, Very Special Maths.

[41]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Mental representation: What can pitch tell us about the distance effect? , 2008, Cortex.

[43]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Developmental Specialization in the Right Intraparietal Sulcus for the Abstract Representation of Numerical Magnitude , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number-space mappings: what underlies mathematics achievement? , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[45]  J. Cantlon,et al.  Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans , 2006, Psychological science.

[46]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Cortical Microcircuit Dynamics Mediating Binocular Rivalry: the Role of Adaptation in Inhibition , 2022 .

[47]  Susan Carey,et al.  One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles , 2007, Cognition.

[48]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  How do people apprehend large numerosities? , 2008, Cognition.

[49]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[50]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The neural origin of the priming distance effect: Distance‐dependent recovery of parietal activation using symbolic magnitudes , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[51]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Profiles of Dyscalculia: An Explanation Based on a Double Exact-and-Approximate Number Representation Model , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[52]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  A Supramodal Number Representation in Human Intraparietal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.