Controlled Straight Mobility and Energy-Aware Routing in Robotic Wireless Sensor Networks

Power-aware routing and controlled mobility schemes are two commonly used mechanisms for improving communications in a wireless sensor network. While the former actively consider the transmission costs when selecting the next hop on the route, the latter instruct mobile relay nodes (either sensors or actuators) to pursue more promising locations so as to optimize end-to-end transmission power. Rarely, if ever, the two methodologies are exploited together for achieving relevant energy savings and prolonging network lifetime. In this paper, we introduce a hybrid routing-mobility model for the optimization of network communications. First, we find a multi-hop path between a source and its destination in an energy-efficient fashion and then we move all hop nodes in an uninterrupted, straight manner to some predefined spots with optimal energy-saving properties, fully preserving the path connectivity as they move. Such synergetic approach allowed us to: (1) seamlessly guarantee message delivery regardless of the network density (average number of neighbors per node), (2) easily incorporate any power-related optimization criterion to the routing protocol and (3) even target scenarios where both end nodes are actually disconnected from each other. Results gathered from extensive simulations argue for the introduction of the proposed hybrid framework.

[1]  Valeria Loscrì,et al.  Simulations of the Impact of Controlled Mobility for Routing Protocols , 2010, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[2]  Emanuele Viterbo,et al.  Optimal Placement of Wireless Nodes for Maximizing Path Lifetime , 2008, IEEE Communications Letters.

[3]  David Tse,et al.  Mobility increases the capacity of ad-hoc wireless networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[4]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Power-aware semi-beaconless 3D georouting algorithms using adjustable transmission ranges for wireless ad hoc and sensor networks , 2010, Ad Hoc Networks.

[5]  Jie Lin,et al.  Towards mobility as a network control primitive , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[6]  Hai Liu,et al.  Localized Mobility Control Routing in Robotic Sensor Wireless Networks , 2007, MSN.

[7]  Gregory G. Finn,et al.  Routing and Addressing Problems in Large Metropolitan-Scale Internetworks. ISI Research Report. , 1987 .

[8]  Mac Schwager,et al.  From Theory to Practice: Distributed Coverage Control Experiments with Groups of Robots , 2008, ISER.

[9]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Depth First Search-based and power-aware geo-routing in ad hoc and sensor wireless networks , 2008, Int. J. Auton. Adapt. Commun. Syst..

[10]  Jie Wu,et al.  Mobility control schemes with quick convergence in wireless sensor networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing.

[11]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  On delivery guarantees of face and combined greedy-face routing in ad hoc and sensor networks , 2006, MobiCom '06.

[12]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Power-Aware Localized Routing in Wireless Networks , 2001, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[13]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1999, DIALM '99.

[14]  David Simplot-Ryl,et al.  Energy Efficient Mobile Routing in Actuator and Sensor Networks with Connectivity Preservation , 2011, ADHOC-NOW.