From function to context to form: precedents and focus shifts in the form creation process

In design, the form creation process involves imagining, seeing and drawing. Translating the vague and imprecise initial ideas into sketches requires significant ability, and in this process, images of existing products (precedents) are a welcomed aid. Searching for them, however, is difficult, because it requires either exhaustive browsing or verbalization of the ideas to be able to use search engines.This paper presents an approach that uses images as query seeds instead of keywords called Query by Example (QBE). This approach is tested through an empirical study. It shows that the approach is a significant step into helping designers satisfy their visual information needs. It also shows that, as designers change their focus from function to context to form, their way of expressing their information needs changes. It concludes suggesting ways of improving both current systems and the QBE software tested.

[1]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Developments in design methodology , 1984 .

[2]  Clement T. Yu,et al.  Design, implementation and evaluation of SCORE (a system for content based retrieval of pictures) , 1995, Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Data Engineering.

[3]  Ulrich Flemming,et al.  A hybrid representation of architectural precedents , 2001 .

[4]  Donald A. Schön Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[5]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements , 2000 .

[6]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Executive Control Processes in Reading , 1987 .

[7]  T. Kuhn Second thoughts on paradigms , 1977 .

[8]  J. D. Restrepo-Giraldo Information processing in design , 2004 .

[9]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Essential Tension , 1977 .

[10]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 1996 .

[11]  Mark D. Gross,et al.  The Electronic Cocktail Napkin—a computational environment for working with design diagrams , 1996 .

[12]  Rivka Oxman,et al.  Design by re-representation: a model of visual reasoning in design , 1997 .

[13]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[14]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[15]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[16]  Yasuhiro Yamamoto,et al.  A framework that supports collective creativity in design using visual images , 1999, Creativity & Cognition.

[17]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  The right tool at the right time: investigation of freehand drawing as an interface to knowledge-based design tools , 1998 .

[18]  Masahito Hirakawa,et al.  IconicBrowser: an iconic retrieval system for object-oriented databases , 1989, [Proceedings] 1989 IEEE Workshop on Visual Languages.

[19]  Walter P. Vispoel,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition for Application: Cognitive Flexibility and Transfer in Complex Content Domains. Technical Report No. 409. , 1987 .

[20]  Wim Muller,et al.  Typology and the organization of design knowledge , 1996 .

[21]  G. Altshuller Creativity as an exact science : the theory of the solution of inventive problems , 1984 .

[22]  G. Goldschmidt The dialectics of sketching , 1991 .

[23]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. , 1987 .

[24]  Donald A. Schön Designing: Rules, types and worlds , 1988 .

[25]  Simone Santini,et al.  Emergent Semantics through Interaction in Image Databases , 2001, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[26]  Alfredo Ferando Perata Materials in design , 1970 .