Cheap Talk Scripts and Online Choice Experiments: “Looking Beyond the Mean”
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Donald M. Waldman,et al. (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/jae.984 LEARNING AND FATIGUE DURING CHOICE EXPERIMENTS: A COMPARISON OF ONLINE AND MAIL SURVEY MODES , 2022 .
[2] Kenneth E. Train,et al. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .
[3] Patricia A. Champ,et al. Using Respondent Uncertainty to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in a Stated Choice Experiment , 2010, Land Economics.
[4] T. Schroeder,et al. European preferences for beef steak attributes , 2005 .
[5] John A. List,et al. What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? , 2001 .
[6] Bill Provencher,et al. Accounting for Respondent Uncertainty to Improve Willingness‐to‐Pay Estimates , 2010 .
[7] D. Hensher,et al. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .
[8] Jutta Roosen,et al. Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States , 2003 .
[9] Hillary M. Sackett,et al. Discrete Choice Modeling of Consumer Preferences for Sustainably Produced Steak and Apples , 2012 .
[10] R. G. Cummings,et al. Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method , 1999 .
[11] Richard C. Bishop,et al. A Comparison of Approaches to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias , 2009, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
[12] Tiago Domingos,et al. Testing for the survey mode effect on contingent valuation data quality: A case study of web based versus in-person interviews , 2007 .
[13] Assessing Management Options for Weed Control with Demanders and Non-Demanders in a Choice Experiment , 2008, Land Economics.
[14] R. Johnston,et al. Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Land Preservation and Policy Process Attributes: Does the Method Matter? , 2007 .
[15] John A. List,et al. Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards , 2001 .
[16] Robert Shupp,et al. Valuations of ‘Sustainably Produced’ Labels on Beef, Tomato, and Apple Products , 2009, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
[17] Thomas C. Brown,et al. Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation , 2003 .
[18] T. Schroeder,et al. Consumer Valuations of Beef Steak Food Safety Enhancement in Canada, Japan, Mexico, and the United States , 2009 .
[19] Magnus Johannesson,et al. Calibrating Hypothetical Willingness to Pay Responses , 1999 .
[20] W. Kip Viscusi,et al. Adaptive Responses to Chemical Labeling: Are Workers Bayesian Decision Makers? , 1984 .
[21] John B. Loomis,et al. Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions , 2005 .
[22] Jayson L. Lusk,et al. Willingness‐to‐Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making , 2004 .
[23] M. Loureiro,et al. A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability , 2007 .
[24] T. Schroeder,et al. Effects of additional quality attributes on consumer willingness-to-pay for food labels , 2007 .
[25] Christopher M. Fleming,et al. Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.
[26] Carl Johan Lagerkvist,et al. Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments , 2005 .
[27] T. Schroeder,et al. Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .
[28] Forecasting Hypothetical Bias : A Tale of Two Calibrations , 2004 .
[29] F. Bailey Norwood,et al. Can Calibration Reconcile Stated and Observed Preferences? , 2005, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
[30] K. Train,et al. Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.
[31] Wuyang Hu,et al. Labeling Context and Reference Point Effects in Models of Food Attribute Demand , 2006 .
[32] Owen R. Phillips,et al. A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation , 2007 .
[33] Søren Bøye Olsen,et al. Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods , 2009 .
[34] William H. Greene,et al. NLOGIT version 3.0 : reference guide , 2002 .
[35] Zhifeng Gao,et al. Effects of Label Information on Consumer Willingness‐To‐Pay for Food Attributes , 2009 .
[36] W. Kip Viscusi,et al. Age Variations in Risk Perceptions and Smoking Decisions , 1991 .
[37] Jordan J. Louviere,et al. Experimental choice analysis: Introduction and overview , 1991 .
[38] F. Norwood,et al. Consumer Demand for a Ban on Antibiotic Drug Use in Pork Production , 2006 .
[39] G. Tonsor. Consumer inferences of food safety and quality , 2011 .
[40] Robert P. Berrens,et al. Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences , 2004 .
[41] Burkhard C. Schipper,et al. Incentives for Subjects in Internet Experiments , 2009 .
[42] W. Michael Hanemann,et al. Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .
[43] J. Lusk,et al. Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness‐To‐Pay for Golden Rice , 2003 .
[44] Angela P. Wetzel. Internet, mail, and mixed‐mode surveys: The tailored design method , 2010 .
[45] Mitesh Kataria,et al. Willingness to pay for environmental improvements in hydropower regulated rivers , 2009 .
[46] Gregory L. Poe,et al. Provision Point Mechanisms and Field Validity Tests of Contingent Valuation , 2002 .
[47] James J. Murphy,et al. Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Hypothetical Bias in a Provision Point Mechanism? , 2003 .
[48] F. Norwood,et al. Effect of Experimental Design on Choice‐Based Conjoint Valuation Estimates , 2005 .
[49] John A. List,et al. Using Choice Experiments to Value Non-Market Goods and Services: Evidence from Field Experiments , 2006 .
[50] Timothy C. Haab,et al. Telephone presurveys, self-selection, and non-response bias to mail and Internet surveys in economic research , 2004 .
[51] I. Krinsky,et al. On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .
[52] J. Rolfe,et al. Comparing responses from web and paper-based collection modes in a choice modelling experiment , 2009 .
[53] J. Lusk,et al. Marketing Opportunities for Certified Pork Chops , 2006 .
[54] Arthur J. Caplan,et al. Cheap Talk Reconsidered: New Evidence From CVM , 2006 .
[55] Richard C. Bishop,et al. Using Donation Mechanisms to Value Nonuse Benefits from Public Goods , 1997 .
[56] Robert P. Berrens,et al. Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis , 2004 .
[57] Steven D. Levitt,et al. FIELD EXPERIMENTS IN ECONOMICS : THE PAST , THE PRESENT , AND THE FUTURE , 2008 .
[58] J. I. The Design of Experiments , 1936, Nature.
[59] Magnus Johannesson,et al. Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2008 .
[60] Chengyan Yue,et al. Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias , 2010 .
[61] Mark J. Garratt,et al. Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications , 1994 .