A randomized trial assessing the effects of health claims on choice of foods in the presence of front-of-pack labels.

Background As a public health intervention, front-of-pack labels (FoPLs) have the potential to reach large numbers of consumers and promote healthier food choices. Of the different FoPLs, those that summarize a product's overall nutritional profile tend to be most effective in guiding healthier choices. However, information is lacking as to whether FoPLs are as effective when nutrient or health claims also appear on-pack. Objective The aim of this study was to examine how the choice of foods of varying levels of healthfulness (less healthy, moderately healthy, and healthier) is affected by the appearance of various FoPLs (Daily Intake Guide, Multiple Traffic Lights, Health Star Rating) when shown in combination with different claim conditions (no claim, nutrient claim, general-level health claim, and higher-level health claim). Design Adults and children (n = 2069) completed a discrete-choice experiment online. Respondents were shown 8 choice sets, each containing 4 alternatives of the same food type (cookies, cornflakes, pizza, or yogurt) of varying levels of healthfulness and were asked which product they would likely purchase (or they could select none). Respondents were randomly assigned to view 1 of the 3 FoPLs across all choice sets. Claim type and healthfulness varied within choice sets in accordance with a D-efficient design. Results The probability of choosing a healthy product and avoiding an unhealthy product was greatest when only an FoPL (especially the Health Star Rating) appeared on-pack. The addition of a nutrient or health claim did not affect the likelihood of picking healthier products but did increase the likelihood of selecting less healthy foods across all FoPL conditions. Conclusions FoPLs are most effective in helping consumers make better food choices when nutrient and health claims are not present. Policies are required to control how nutrient and health claims are applied to less healthy foods. This trial was registered as ACTRN12617000015347 (www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Resgistration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372055&isReview=true).

[1]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and willingness to pay , 2017, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[2]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  Consumers’ responses to health claims in the context of other on-pack nutrition information: a systematic review , 2017, Nutrition reviews.

[3]  Bridget Kelly,et al.  The types and aspects of front-of-pack food labelling schemes preferred by adults and children , 2017, Appetite.

[4]  Bruce Neal,et al.  Do Health Claims and Front-of-Pack Labels Lead to a Positivity Bias in Unhealthy Foods? , 2016, Nutrients.

[5]  S. Pettigrew,et al.  The combined effect of front-of-pack nutrition labels and health claims on consumers' evaluation of food products , 2016 .

[6]  Alicia L. Rihn,et al.  Are Grocery Shoppers of Households with Weight-Concerned Members Willing to Pay More for Nutrtional Information on Food? , 2015 .

[7]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  Front of Pack Labels Enhance Attention to Nutrition Information in Novel & Commercial Brands. , 2015, Food policy.

[8]  H. Dagevos,et al.  The Growing Role of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Profile Labeling: A Consumer Perspective on Key Issues and Controversies , 2011, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[9]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Which front-of-pack nutrition label is the most efficient one? The results of an eye-tracker study , 2015 .

[10]  R. Hamlin,et al.  The impact of front-of-pack nutrition labels on consumer product evaluation and choice: an experimental study , 2014, Public Health Nutrition.

[11]  Peter Helfer,et al.  The effects of nutrition labeling on consumer food choice: a psychological experiment and computational model , 2014, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Janet Hoek,et al.  Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations , 2014, Appetite.

[13]  M. L’Abbé,et al.  Consumer attitudes and understanding of cholesterol-lowering claims on food: randomize mock-package experiments with plant sterol and oat fibre claims , 2014, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[14]  S. Hieke,et al.  Inferring product healthfulness from nutrition labelling. The influence of reference points , 2014, Appetite.

[15]  Behavioural effects of directive cues on front-of-package nutrition information: the combination matters! , 2013, Public Health Nutrition.

[16]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Standing out in the crowd: The effect of information clutter on consumer attention for front-of-pack nutrition labels , 2013 .

[17]  S. Henson,et al.  Consumer attitudes and understanding of low-sodium claims on food: an analysis of healthy and hypertensive individuals. , 2013, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  James C Hersey,et al.  Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers. , 2012, Nutrition reviews.

[19]  Julie Barnett,et al.  Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: A consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling , 2012, Appetite.

[20]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Attentional capture and understanding of nutrition labelling: a study based on response times , 2012, International journal of food sciences and nutrition.

[21]  Peggy J. Liu,et al.  The science on front-of-package food labels , 2012, Public Health Nutrition.

[22]  R. McLean,et al.  Effects of alternative label formats on choice of high- and low-sodium products in a New Zealand population sample , 2012, Public Health Nutrition.

[23]  J. Louviere,et al.  Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[24]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK , 2010, Appetite.

[25]  J. Barreiro-Hurlé,et al.  The Effects of Multiple Health and Nutrition Labels on Consumer Food Choices , 2010 .

[26]  D. Marshall.  Understanding Children as Consumers , 2010 .

[27]  Mei-Hua Chen,et al.  Nutrition labels: a survey of use, understanding and preferences among ethnically diverse shoppers in New Zealand , 2009, Public Health Nutrition.

[28]  Sandra L. Calvert.  Children as Consumers: Advertising and Marketing , 2008, The Future of children.

[29]  D. Street,et al.  The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods by STREET, D. J. and BURGESS, L. , 2007 .

[30]  Deborah J. Street,et al.  The Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments , 2007 .

[31]  Scot Burton,et al.  When Do Nutrient Content and Nutrient Content Claims Matter? Assessing Consumer Tradeoffs Between Carbohydrates and Fat , 2007 .

[32]  Miles Richardson,et al.  An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements , 2007, Public Health Nutrition.

[33]  Lindsay McLaren,et al.  Socioeconomic status and obesity. , 2007, Epidemiologic reviews.

[34]  B. Wansink,et al.  Can “Low-Fat” Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity? , 2006 .

[35]  C. Patch,et al.  Australian consumers are sceptical about but influenced by claims about fat on food labels , 2005, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[36]  B. Wansink.  How Do Front and Back Package Labels Influence Beliefs About Health Claims? , 2003 .

[37]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[38]  Scot Burton,et al.  Making Healthful Food Choices: The Influence of Health Claims and Nutrition Information on Consumers’ Evaluations of Packaged Food Products and Restaurant Menu Items , 2003 .

[39]  Andreas Kontoleon,et al.  Assessing the impacts of alternative 'Opt-out' formats in choice experiment studies: Consumer preferences for genetically modified content and production information in food , 2003 .

[40]  Catherine A. Cole,et al.  Consumers' Search and Use of Nutrition Information: The Challenge and Promise of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act , 2002 .

[41]  P. Boxall,et al.  Future Directions of Stated Choice Methods for Environment Valuation , 2001 .

[42]  A. Astrup,et al.  Obesity : Preventing and managing the global epidemic , 2000 .

[43]  Scot Burton,et al.  Effects of Nutrition Facts Panel Values, Nutrition Claims, and Health Claims on Consumer Attitudes, Perceptions of Disease-Related Risks, and Trust , 2000 .

[44]  Brian E. Roe,et al.  The Impact of Health Claims on Consumer Search and Product Evaluation Outcomes: Results from FDA Experimental Data , 1999 .

[45]  Scot Burton,et al.  The Effects of Nutrition Package Claims, Nutrition Facts Panels, and Motivation to Process Nutrition Information on Consumer Product Evaluations , 1997 .

[46]  Manoj Hastak,et al.  Can Consumers Interpret Nutrition Information in the Presence of a Health Claim? A Laboratory Investigation , 1996 .

[47]  Michael Creel,et al.  Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. , 1991 .