Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP.

The implications of an increase in field strength, from 1.5 T to 3 T, for routine functional cardiac examinations have been systematically investigated. Flip angle optimization was carried out for identical SSFP and FLASH cine imaging sequences at 1.5 T and 3 T, which supported the use of 20 degrees (FLASH 1.5 T and 3 T) and >60 degrees (SSFP 1.5 T and 3 T). The optimized sequences were applied in a study of cardiac function in a group of ten normal volunteers. Both SSFP and FLASH sequences showed significant SNR increases in the myocardium and blood at 3 T compared with 1.5 T, increases of 48% and 30% (myocardium and blood, respectively) for the SSFP sequence and 19% and 13% for the FLASH sequence. The SSFP sequence also showed a significant increase in CNR (22%). Image quality assessment revealed that the SSFP acquisitions were superior to FLASH at both field strengths. Although SSFP contained more artifacts at 3 T, they would not prevent its clinical use. We conclude that cardiac functional examinations at 3 T should use SSFP sequences.

[1]  R. Balaban,et al.  Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  Fritz Schick,et al.  Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential , 2005, European Radiology.

[3]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  H. Amthauer,et al.  Comparison of Different Cardiac MRI Sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with Respect to Signal-to-Noise and Contrast-to-Noise Ratios - Initial Experience* , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[5]  G. Wright,et al.  Blood Relaxation Properties at 3T -- Effects of Blood Oxygen Saturation , 2003 .

[6]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[7]  Michael Markl,et al.  On flow effects in balanced steady‐state free precession imaging: Pictorial description, parameter dependence, and clinical implications , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  H. Rinneberg,et al.  Human cardiac imaging at 3 T using phased array coils , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  T J Brady,et al.  Cardiac susceptibility artifacts arising from the heart‐lung interface , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  B Stoeckel,et al.  [3 Tesla MRI: successful results with higher field strengths]. , 2004, Der Radiologe.

[11]  Dark flow artifacts with steady-state free precession cine MR technique: causes and implications for cardiac MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[12]  L. Dougherty,et al.  Cardiac imaging at 4 Tesla , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Lawrence L Wald,et al.  Comparison of Cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Clinical Whole Body Systems , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Xavier Golay,et al.  Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T , 2005, European Radiology.

[16]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Preliminary report on in vivo coronary MRA at 3 Tesla in humans , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  N J Pelc,et al.  Flow effects in balanced steady state free precession imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Michael Schär,et al.  Local Linear Shimming for Cardiac SSFP Imaging at 3T , 2002 .

[19]  R. Edelman,et al.  Flow artifacts in steady‐state free precession cine imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Debiao Li,et al.  Artifact reduction in true‐FISP imaging of the coronary arteries by adjusting imaging frequency , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  C H Lorenz,et al.  Performance of QRS detection for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with a novel vectorcardiographic triggering method , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.