Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kieran Clarke | Stefan Neubauer | Matthew D Robson | Steffen E Petersen | Damian J Tyler | Jane M Francis | Peter Weale | M. Robson | S. Petersen | J. Francis | P. Weale | S. Neubauer | K. Clarke | D. Tyler | L. Hudsmith | Lucy E Hudsmith
[1] R. Balaban,et al. Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast. , 1995, Radiology.
[2] Fritz Schick,et al. Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential , 2005, European Radiology.
[3] Peter Boesiger,et al. Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[4] H. Amthauer,et al. Comparison of Different Cardiac MRI Sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with Respect to Signal-to-Noise and Contrast-to-Noise Ratios - Initial Experience* , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.
[5] G. Wright,et al. Blood Relaxation Properties at 3T -- Effects of Blood Oxygen Saturation , 2003 .
[6] T. Foster,et al. A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.
[7] Michael Markl,et al. On flow effects in balanced steady‐state free precession imaging: Pictorial description, parameter dependence, and clinical implications , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[8] H. Rinneberg,et al. Human cardiac imaging at 3 T using phased array coils , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[9] T J Brady,et al. Cardiac susceptibility artifacts arising from the heart‐lung interface , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[10] B Stoeckel,et al. [3 Tesla MRI: successful results with higher field strengths]. , 2004, Der Radiologe.
[11] Dark flow artifacts with steady-state free precession cine MR technique: causes and implications for cardiac MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.
[12] L. Dougherty,et al. Cardiac imaging at 4 Tesla , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[13] Lawrence L Wald,et al. Comparison of Cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Clinical Whole Body Systems , 2003, Investigative radiology.
[14] Xavier Golay,et al. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[15] M. Gutberlet,et al. Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T , 2005, European Radiology.
[16] René M. Botnar,et al. Preliminary report on in vivo coronary MRA at 3 Tesla in humans , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[17] N J Pelc,et al. Flow effects in balanced steady state free precession imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[18] Michael Schär,et al. Local Linear Shimming for Cardiac SSFP Imaging at 3T , 2002 .
[19] R. Edelman,et al. Flow artifacts in steady‐state free precession cine imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[20] Debiao Li,et al. Artifact reduction in true‐FISP imaging of the coronary arteries by adjusting imaging frequency , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[21] C H Lorenz,et al. Performance of QRS detection for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with a novel vectorcardiographic triggering method , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.