User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles

Abstract This study gains insight into individual motivations for choosing to own and use autonomous vehicles and develops a model for autonomous vehicle long-term choice decisions. A stated preference questionnaire is distributed to 721 individuals living across Israel and North America. Based on the characteristics of their current commutes, individuals are presented with various scenarios and asked to choose the car they would use for their commute. A vehicle choice model which includes three options is estimated: (1) Continue to commute using a regular car that you have in your possession. (2) Buy and shift to commuting using a privately-owned autonomous vehicle (PAV). (3) Shift to using a shared-autonomous vehicle (SAV), from a fleet of on-demand cars for your commute. A factor analysis determined five relevant latent variables describing the individuals’ attitudes: technology interest, environmental concern, enjoy driving, public transit attitude, and pro-AV sentiments. The effects that the characteristics of the individual and the autonomous vehicle have on use and acceptance are quantified through random utility models including logit kernel model taking into account panel effects. Currently, large overall hesitations towards autonomous vehicle adoption exist, with 44% of choice decisions remaining regular vehicles. Early AV adopters will likely be young, students, more educated, and spend more time in vehicles. Even if the SAV service were to be completely free, only 75% of individuals would currently be willing to use SAVs. The study also found various differences regarding the preferences of individuals in Israel and North America, namely that Israelis are overall more likely to shift to autonomous vehicles. Methods to encourage SAV use include increasing the costs for regular cars as well as educating the public about the benefits of shared autonomous vehicles.

[1]  Daniel J. Fagnant,et al.  Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .

[2]  G. Roehrich.  Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements , 2004 .

[3]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the U.S., the U.K., and Australia , 2014 .

[4]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[5]  G. Ewing,et al.  Assessing Consumer Preferences for Clean-Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Experiment , 2000 .

[6]  Jin-Hyuk Chung,et al.  The effect of psychological traits on mode choice behaviour: an application to a new water transit system in Seoul, Korea , 2013 .

[7]  Adam Sebastian Jardim,et al.  A Study of Public Acceptance of Autonomous Cars , 2013 .

[8]  Ichm Ilse Megens.  Vehicle users' preferences concerning automated driving:implications for transportation and market planning , 2014 .

[9]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .

[10]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[11]  Prem Chand Devarasetty,et al.  Can psychological variables help predict the use of priced managed lanes , 2014 .

[12]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  Attitudes towards mode choice in Switzerland , 2013 .

[13]  Stephen D. Boyles,et al.  Effects of Autonomous Vehicle Ownership on Trip, Mode, and Route Choice , 2015 .

[14]  James Rubin,et al.  Choosing Transit: The Influence of Past Travel Behavior, Attitudes and Habits on Present Choices , 2011 .

[15]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[16]  William Payre,et al.  Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability , 2014 .

[17]  Elisabetta Cherchi,et al.  A long panel survey to elicit variation in preferences and attitudes in the choice of electric vehicles , 2014 .