Flexible UV‐Ozone‐Modified Carbon Nanotube Electrodes for Neuronal Recording

Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2177–2181 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag G Neurophysiologists have used sharpened metal electrodes to electrically stimulate neuronal activities to investigate the physiological functions of the brain. Moreover, they employed this electrical stimulation to treat diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, and chronic pain. As neurons utilize electrical potential difference between their cell membranes to transmit electrical signals, this particular way of communication enables us to record the neuronal activity extracellularly or intracellularly. For the extracellular recording approach, the electrodes are positioned intimately next to neuron cells to record and to stimulate their electrical activity by capacitive coupling. The coupling efficacy of these electrical recordings or interventions depends significantly on the selectivity, sensitivity, charge-transfer characteristics, long-term chemical stability, and interfacial impedance between electrodes and target tissue. The most common approach to further investigate the functional behavior of neurons, is using Si-based multimicroelectrode probes fabricated by the micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) method to replace the conventional electrodes (Ag/AgCl) in the aspect of device-structure improvement and scaling down device sizes. However, Si-based MEMS electrodes are extremely rigid and cannot be deformed inside the organs; therefore, the recorded positions are easily shifted and the target tissues are consequently damaged when the animals are in motion. This will become an obstacle in future long-term implantation and real-time recording applications. An alternative method is the use of flexible electrodes presented by several groups. The authors utilized soft materials, such as poly(dimethylsiloxane), SU-8 epoxy-based negative photoresist, and polyimides, to fabricate microelectrodes that can deform while being attached to the tissues and that can also be fabricated into small-scale devices using MEMS methods. Not only would rigid Si-based MEMS probes damage target tissues, the reduced electrode size also resulted in a significantly increase in impedance that may degrade recording sensitivity and limit the stimulating current deliverable through an electrode. In order to resolve above issues, the impedance of the electrodemust be as low as possible. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) exhibit intrinsically large surface areas (700–1000m g ), high electrical conductivity, and intriguing physicochemical properties. Most importantly, CNTs are chemically inert and biocompatible. Based on the above, the promising advantages of flexible substrates and CNTs lead the attempt of fabricating CNTs directly on flexible substrates as microelectrodes for neuronal recording. In this work, the feasibilities of growing CNTs on flexible polyimide substrates at low temperatures (400 8C) by catalyst-assisted chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and utilizing the above devices (see the schematic image in Fig. 1a and the photo in Fig. 1b) as electrodes for extracellularly neuronal recording were investigated. The electrical enhancement (by UV-ozone exposure), biocompatibility (by neuron cell cultures), long-term usage and adhesion, and the detection of action-potential signals on crayfish (using flexible UV-ozone-modified CNTelectrodes) were examined. After a series of process optimizations, the 5-nm Ni-catalyst layer and C2H2 (60 sccm)/H2 (10 sccm) process gases at 5 Torr were found to be the optimum CNT growth parameters in this work. Besides, the Au layer could facilitate CNTgrowth. Figure 1c shows that CNTs have been grown on the polyimide substrate with Au layer, while not on that without Au layer (the inset). The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image (Fig. 1d) further confirms the successful syntheses of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) at 400 8C or even down to 350 8C with H2 plasma pretreatment prior to the CVD processing. As shown in the Supporting Information (Fig. S1a),

[1]  Yung-Chan Chen,et al.  Interfacing neurons both extracellularly and intracellularly using carbon-nanotube probes with long-term endurance. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  D. Robinson,et al.  The electrical properties of metal microelectrodes , 1968 .

[3]  E. Schmidt,et al.  Long-term implants of Parylene-C coated microelectrodes , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[4]  Andrew B. Schwartz,et al.  Brain-Controlled Interfaces: Movement Restoration with Neural Prosthetics , 2006, Neuron.

[5]  B. Botterman,et al.  Carbon nanotube coating improves neuronal recordings. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[6]  Manhong Liu,et al.  Chemical modification of single-walled carbon nanotubes with peroxytrifluoroacetic acid , 2005 .

[7]  Anton V. Liopo,et al.  Stimulation of Neural Cells by Lateral Currents in Conductive Layer‐by‐Layer Films of Single‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes , 2006 .

[8]  Gengfeng Zheng,et al.  Detection, Stimulation, and Inhibition of Neuronal Signals with High-Density Nanowire Transistor Arrays , 2006, Science.

[9]  M. Meyyappan,et al.  Carbon Nanotube Nanoelectrode Array for Ultrasensitive DNA Detection , 2003 .

[10]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Hongjie Dai,et al.  Neural stimulation with a carbon nanotube microelectrode array. , 2006, Nano letters.

[12]  K. Ulbrich,et al.  Novel vectors for gene delivery formed by self-assembly of DNA with poly(L-lysine) grafted with hydrophilic polymers. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[13]  G. E. Loeb,et al.  Toward the ultimate metal microelectrode , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Poly(l-lysine)-g-Poly(ethylene glycol) Layers on Metal Oxide Surfaces: Attachment Mechanism and Effects of Polymer Architecture on Resistance to Protein Adsorption† , 2000 .

[15]  E. S. Snow,et al.  Chemical Detection with a Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Capacitor , 2005, Science.

[16]  Jun Li,et al.  Inlaid Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Nanoelectrode Arrays for Electroanalysis , 2005 .

[17]  Jun Li,et al.  Vertically aligned carbon nanofiber arrays: an advance toward electrical-neural interfaces. , 2006, Small.

[18]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[19]  K. Mabuchi,et al.  3D flexible multichannel neural probe array , 2004 .

[20]  C. Bittencourt,et al.  Radio-frequency plasma functionalization of carbon nanotubes surface O2, NH3, and CF4 treatments , 2005 .

[21]  Winnie Jensen,et al.  In-vivo implant mechanics of flexible, silicon-based ACREO microelectrode arrays in rat cerebral cortex , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  K. Djupsund,et al.  Flexible polyimide microelectrode array for in vivo recordings and current source density analysis. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[23]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  Kong,et al.  Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors , 2000, Science.

[25]  M. Prato,et al.  Carbon nanotube substrates boost neuronal electrical signaling. , 2005, Nano letters.

[26]  T. Mallouk,et al.  Individual single-walled nanotubes and hydrogels made by oxidative exfoliation of carbon nanotube ropes. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  S. Iijima Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon , 1991, Nature.

[28]  Huaihe Song,et al.  A comparative study of electrochemical properties of two kinds of carbon nanotubes as anode materials for lithium ion batteries , 2008 .

[29]  Meng-Kao Yeh,et al.  Mechanical behavior of phenolic-based composites reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes , 2006 .

[30]  J. Justin Gooding,et al.  Nanostructuring electrodes with carbon nanotubes: A review on electrochemistry and applications for sensing , 2005 .

[31]  E. Lewis,et al.  Silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays for parallel recording of neural activity in peripheral and cranial nerves , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Richard G Compton,et al.  Electrocatalysis at graphite and carbon nanotube modified electrodes: edge-plane sites and tube ends are the reactive sites. , 2005, Chemical communications.

[33]  L. Merabet,et al.  What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Shin-Hua Tseng,et al.  Induction of High-Frequency Oscillations in a Junction-Coupled Network , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  James Alastair McLaughlin,et al.  High resolution XPS characterization of chemical functionalised MWCNTs and SWCNTs , 2005 .

[36]  Thomas Stieglitz,et al.  A flexible, light-weight multichannel sieve electrode with integrated cables for interfacing regenerating peripheral nerves , 1997 .

[37]  Jong-sang Park,et al.  Synthesis of a Barbell-like Triblock Copolymer, Poly(l-lysine) Dendrimer-block-Poly(ethylene glycol)-block-Poly(l-lysine) Dendrimer, and Its Self-Assembly with Plasmid DNA , 2000 .