The Causative Classification of Stroke system: An international reliability and optimization study

Background: Valid and reliable ischemic stroke subtype determination is crucial for well-powered multicenter studies. The Causative Classification of Stroke System (CCS, available at http://ccs.mgh.harvard.edu) is a computerized, evidence-based algorithm that provides both causative and phenotypic stroke subtypes in a rule-based manner. We determined whether CCS demonstrates high interrater reliability in order to be useful for international multicenter studies. Methods: Twenty members of the International Stroke Genetics Consortium from 13 centers in 8 countries, who were not involved in the design and development of the CCS, independently assessed the same 50 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke through reviews of abstracted case summaries. Agreement among ratings was measured by kappa statistic. Results: The κ value for causative classification was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78–0.81) for the 5-subtype, 0.79 (95% CI 0.77–0.80) for the 8-subtype, and 0.70 (95% CI 0.69–0.71) for the 16-subtype CCS. Correction of a software-related factor that generated ambiguity improved agreement: κ = 0.81 (95% CI 0.79–0.82) for the 5-subtype, 0.79 (95% CI 0.77–0.80) for the 8-subtype, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.78–0.80) for the 16-subtype CCS. The κ value for phenotypic classification was 0.79 (95% CI 0.77–0.82) for supra-aortic large artery atherosclerosis, 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.98) for cardioembolism, 0.88 (95% CI 0.85–0.91) for small artery occlusion, and 0.79 (0.76–0.82) for other uncommon causes. Conclusions: CCS allows classification of stroke subtypes by multiple investigators with high reliability, supporting its potential for improving stroke classification in multicenter studies and ensuring accurate means of communication among different researchers, institutions, and eras.

[1]  D. Leys,et al.  Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging within 6 Hours of Stroke Onset: Inter- and Intra-Observer Reproducibility , 2003, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[2]  J. Fleiss Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[3]  P. Tyrrell,et al.  Classification of Minor Stroke: Intra- and Inter-Observer Reliability , 2009, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[4]  Thomas Benner,et al.  A Computerized Algorithm for Etiologic Classification of Ischemic Stroke: The Causative Classification of Stroke System , 2007, Stroke.

[5]  Adnan I. Qureshi,et al.  Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke , 2007 .

[6]  M. Hennerici,et al.  New Approach to Stroke Subtyping: The A-S-C-O (Phenotypic) Classification of Stroke , 2009, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[7]  Jan Potter,et al.  Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale Across Multiple Raters: Benefits of a Structured Interview , 2005, Stroke.

[8]  J. Coast,et al.  Inter-rater reliability of the Barthel ADL Index: how does a researcher compare to a nurse? , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[9]  B. Kissela,et al.  Interobserver agreement in the trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment classification of stroke based on retrospective medical record review. , 2006, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[10]  Matthias J. Müller,et al.  Effects of Interrater Reliability of Psychopathologic Assessment on Power and Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Trials , 2002, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.

[11]  J. Sim,et al.  The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. , 2005, Physical therapy.

[12]  M. Fisher,et al.  Cardiac Workup of Ischemic Stroke: Can We Improve Our Diagnostic Yield? , 2009, Stroke.

[13]  David Lee Gordon,et al.  Classification of Subtype of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Definitions for Use in a Multicenter Clinical Trial , 1993, Stroke.

[14]  David B. Matchar,et al.  Improving the Reliability of Stroke Subgroup Classification Using the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Criteria , 2001, Stroke.

[15]  K. Furie,et al.  An evidence‐based causative classification system for acute ischemic stroke , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[16]  R. Bloch,et al.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. , 1988, Stroke.

[17]  Terence J Quinn,et al.  Exploring the Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale , 2009, Stroke.

[18]  Richard Frayne,et al.  MR Angiography Compared to Conventional Selective Angiography in Acute Stroke , 2006, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[19]  G. Clifton,et al.  Misclassification and treatment effect on primary outcome measures in clinical trials of severe neurotrauma. , 2002, Journal of neurotrauma.

[20]  B. Chakraborty,et al.  Cerebral Angiography , 1951, Neurology.