DIPANALYST: A computer program for quantitative kinematic analysis of rock slope failures

Kinematic analysis is used to analyze the potential for the various modes of structurally controlled rock slope failures (plane, wedge, and toppling failures) due to the presence of unfavorably oriented discontinuities. Traditionally kinematic analysis is performed after plotting discontinuity orientations, slope angle, slope azimuth and representative friction angle value on a stereonet. Due to large number of discontinuities, only representative orientation values (dip/dip direction) for identified cluster sets are considered. This stereonet-based analysis is qualitative in nature and requires the presence of tight data clusters for which a reasonable representative orientation value can be assigned. However, there are cases when a tight circular clustering of discontinuity orientations does not exist, making stereonet-based analysis unreliable. Also, variability of discontinuity data in cluster sets is not easy to consider using the stereonet-based method. To overcome these problems, an application software, DIPANALYST, has been developed by the first author to perform quantitative kinematic analysis based on not just representative discontinuity values, but all discontinuities and their possible intersections. The software calculates ratios of discontinuities or their possible intersections that can potentially cause failures (plane, wedge or toppling) to the total number of discontinuities or their possible intersections. The calculated ratios are known as failure indices, and the method is termed as the quantitative approach for kinematic analysis. DIPANALYST is also capable of performing the traditional stereonet-based method.

[1]  C. Gokceoğlu,et al.  Discontinuity controlled probabilistic slope failure risk maps of the Altindag (settlement) region in Turkey , 2000 .

[3]  Giovanni Grasselli,et al.  ROCKTOPPLE: A spreadsheet-based program for probabilistic block-toppling analysis , 2010, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  Hyuck-Jin Park.  The evaluation of failure probability for rock slope based on fuzzy set theory and Monte Carlo simulation , 2007 .

[5]  R. Fisher.  Dispersion on a sphere , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  Mahtab,et al.  A Rejection Criterion For Definition Of Clusters In Orientation Data , 1982 .

[7]  E. Hoek,et al.  Rock slope engineering , 1974 .

[8]  H. Aksoy,et al.  Fuzzified kinematic analysis of discontinuity-controlled rock slope instabilities , 2007 .

[9]  S. Priest,et al.  Hemispherical Projection Methods in Rock Mechanics , 1985 .

[10]  R. D. Terzaghi.  Sources of Error in Joint Surveys , 1965 .

[12]  Andreas Günther,et al.  SLOPEMAP: programs for automated mapping of geometrical and kinematical properties of hard rock hill slopes , 2003 .

[13]  Hyuck-Jin Park,et al.  Development of a probabilistic approach for rock wedge failure , 2001 .

[14]  S. Priest.  Discontinuity Analysis for Rock Engineering , 1992 .

[15]  R. Goodman.  Introduction to Rock Mechanics , 1980 .

[16]  S. Quek,et al.  Probabilistic stability analysis of excavations in jointed rock , 1995 .

[17]  Graham J. Borradaile,et al.  Statistics of Earth Science Data , 2003 .

[18]  Yonathan Admassu,et al.  Developing Design Methodology for Cut Slopes in Ohio , 2010 .

[19]  C. Leung,et al.  Computer aided analysis of rock slope stability , 1987 .