Identifying threshold concepts and proposing strategies to support doctoral candidates

In this article I argue that doctoral candidates undertake a form of rite of passage, generally incorporating several shorter rites of passage, during their candidature of three to five years. Furthermore, there are times during their research education when many candidates demonstrate through their writing, presentation, discussion, and even demeanour, that they have undergone a change in the way they understand their learning and themselves as learners. These changes, it is suggested, indicate that the candidate has encountered a threshold concept and has crossed that threshold. Encountering these concepts can be a challenging experience for candidates as they transform their ways of viewing knowledge and themselves. For many doctoral candidates there is at least one stage during candidature when they could be described as being ‘stuck’ as they encounter a particular threshold concept which challenges them. The experience of being ‘stuck’ can manifest as depression, a sense of hopelessness, ‘going round in circles’ and so on. This sense of being ‘stuck’ occurs at the time when a candidate can be described as being in a liminal state, the state prior to the crossing of a threshold. Having established this context I then discuss the role of communities of learners and research culture as ways to assist candidates in recognising this ‘stuckness’ and to assist them to become ‘unstuck’ and move on with a new sense of confidence and appreciation of themselves as learners and researchers.

[1]  Barbara E. Lovitts,et al.  The Hidden Crisis in Graduate Education: Attrition from Ph.D. Programs. , 2000 .

[2]  Janice Smith,et al.  Threshold concepts within the disciplines , 2008 .

[3]  Barbara E. Lovitts,et al.  Being a good course‐taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research , 2005 .

[4]  Alison Cook-Sather,et al.  Newly Betwixt and Between: Revising Liminality in the Context of a Teacher Preparation Program , 2006 .

[5]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  'It's a PhD, not a Nobel Prize': How experienced examiners assess research theses , 2002 .

[6]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[7]  Rowena Murray,et al.  The Handbook Of Academic Writing: A Fresh Approach , 2006 .

[8]  J. Hattie,et al.  Predicting examiner recommendations on Ph.D. theses , 2004 .

[9]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge , 2006 .

[10]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[11]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[12]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Psychology and culture. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[14]  Chris M. Golde Signature Pedagogies in Doctoral Education: Are They Adaptable for the Preparation of Education Researchers? , 2007 .

[15]  Barbara E. Lovitts,et al.  Making the implicit explicit : creating performance expectations for the dissertation , 2007 .

[16]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Psychology and Culture , 1993 .

[17]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  Examining the examiners: How inexperienced examiners approach the assessment of research theses , 2004 .