Four design principles for learner dashboards that support student agency and empowerment

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to take a student-centred perspective to understanding the range of ways that students respond to receiving information about their learning behaviours presented on a dashboard. It identifies four principles to inform the design of dashboards which support learner agency and empowerment, features which Prinsloo and Slade (2016) suggest are central to ethical adoption of learning analytics. Design/methodology/approach The study involved semi-structured interviews with 24 final-year undergraduates to explore the students’ response to receiving dashboards that showed the students’ achievement and other learning behaviours. Findings The paper identifies four principles that should be used when designing and adopting learner dashboards to support student agency and empowerment. Research limitations/implications The study was based on a small sample of undergraduate students from the final year from one academic school. The data are based on students’ self-reporting. Practical implications The paper suggests that these four principles are guiding tenets for the design and implementation of learner dashboards in higher education. The four principles are: designs that are customisable by students; foregrounds students sense making; enables students to identify actionable insights; and dashboards are embedded into educational processes. Originality/value The paper’s originality is that it illuminates student-centred principles of learner dashboard design and adoption.

[1]  Lynne D. Roberts,et al.  Learning analytics messages: Impact of grade, sender, comparative information and message style on student affect and academic resilience , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Lynne D. Roberts,et al.  Give Me a Customizable Dashboard: Personalized Learning Analytics Dashboards in Higher Education , 2017, Technology, Knowledge and Learning.

[3]  Blair Thompson,et al.  College Student Ratings of Student Academic Support: Frequency, Importance, and Modes of Communication , 2009 .

[4]  Paul Prinsloo,et al.  An elephant in the learning analytics room: the obligation to act , 2017, LAK.

[5]  J. Sluijter,et al.  Business intelligence (BI) for personalized student dashboards , 2017, LAK.

[6]  Erik Mannens,et al.  Guiding the choice of learning dashboard visualizations: Linking dashboard design and data visualization concepts , 2019, J. Comput. Lang..

[7]  Tom Boyle,et al.  Context and deep learning design , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Harry Torrance,et al.  Formative assessment at the crossroads: conformative, deformative and transformative assessment , 2012 .

[9]  Abelardo Pardo,et al.  Data2U: scalable real time student feedback in active learning environments , 2016, LAK.

[10]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Perceiving Learning at a Glance: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning Dashboard Research , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[11]  D. Boud,et al.  Exploring cultures of feedback practice: the adoption of learning-focused feedback practices in the UK and Australia , 2018, Higher Education Research & Development.

[12]  So Yoon Yoon,et al.  The landscape of PreK-12 engineering online resources for teachers: global trends , 2015 .

[13]  Geert-Jan Houben,et al.  Follow the successful crowd: raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale , 2017, LAK.

[14]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  Awareness Is Not Enough: Pitfalls of Learning Analytics Dashboards in the Educational Practice , 2017, EC-TEL.

[15]  Stephen Brown.  Large-scale innovation and change in UK higher education , 2013 .

[16]  David Boud,et al.  The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback , 2018 .

[17]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Supporting action research with learning analytics , 2013, LAK '13.

[18]  James E. Willis,et al.  Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: a typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective , 2016 .

[19]  Terrie Lynn Thompson,et al.  Learning analytics: challenges and limitations , 2017 .

[20]  Marco Kalz,et al.  Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Ilona Buchem,et al.  Building Global Learning Communities. , 2013 .

[22]  Travis J. Lund,et al.  The importance of context: an exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty , 2015, International Journal of STEM Education.

[23]  Barbara Newland,et al.  Learning Analytics in UK HE 2017 A HeLF Survey Report , 2015 .

[24]  Olga Viberg,et al.  The current landscape of learning analytics in higher education , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics , 2014, LAK.

[26]  P. Prinsloo,et al.  Big Data, Higher Education and Learning Analytics: Beyond Justice, Towards an Ethics of Care , 2017 .

[27]  Ji Won You,et al.  Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[28]  Katrien Verbert,et al.  Review of Research on Student-Facing Learning Analytics Dashboards and Educational Recommender Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[29]  P. Prinsloo,et al.  Learning Analytics , 2013 .

[30]  Shane Dawson,et al.  Setting learning analytics in context: overcoming the barriers to large-scale adoption , 2014, LAK.