Comparison of approaches to weighting of multiple criteria for selecting equipment to optimize performance and safety

Nowadays every piece of working equipment and tools has to comply with safety standards and laws. This study investigated multi-criteria methods for selecting working equipment in order to optimize performance and occupational safety. The multi-criteria decision-making (MDCM) method was applied to the problem of selecting optimal working equipment using four different criterion weighting approaches (direct weighting, revised Simos procedure, Fuller’s triangle and analytic hierarchy process). Groups of economic, technical and safety criteria were defined and five weighting scenarios were developed. Although the four weighting methods produced similar results, in some situations they produced different criterion weighting factors. The final output of the MCDM method was the identification of the optimal forklift in the five weighting scenarios. Although we have applied the MCDM method to a forklift selection problem, it can be applied to all sorts of working equipment in contexts where economic, technical and safety selection criteria can be identified.

[1]  Reinhart Verschoore,et al.  Measurements and simulation on the comfort of forklifts , 2003 .

[2]  Jagath J. Kaluarachchi,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis of treated wastewater use for agriculture in water deficit regions. , 2010 .

[3]  Alireza Bab-Hadiashar,et al.  Analysis of forklift accident trends within Victorian industry (Australia) , 2013 .

[4]  Maher Barkallah,et al.  Multi Objective Optimization for Sustainable Manufacturing, Application in Turning , 2015 .

[5]  Muhammet Gul,et al.  A fuzzy multi criteria risk assessment based on decision matrix technique: A case study for aluminum industry , 2016 .

[6]  Zygmunt Korban Application of the MERIT survey in the multi-criteria quality assessment of occupational health and safety management , 2015, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[7]  R. M. Chandima Ratnayake,et al.  Enhancing offshore process safety by selecting fatigue critical piping locations for inspection using Fuzzy-AHP based approach , 2016 .

[8]  Marco Alberti,et al.  Video surveillance systems to enhance occupational safety: A case study , 2016 .

[9]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Vincent Marchau,et al.  Multi-Criteria Analysis for Evaluating the Impacts of Intelligent Speed Adaptation , 2009 .

[11]  Iraj Mohammadfam,et al.  Developing an integrated decision making approach to assess and promote the effectiveness of occupational health and safety management systems , 2016 .

[12]  Tomislav Šarić,et al.  INVENTORY CLASSIFICATION USING MULTI – CRITERIA ABC ANALYSIS, NEURAL NETWORKS AND CLUSTER ANALYSIS , 2014 .

[13]  V. Senthil,et al.  Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with digraph and matrix approach, AHP and ANP , 2011 .

[14]  Marco Pellegrini,et al.  An innovative methodology for measuring the effective implementation of an Occupational Health and Safety Management System in the European Union , 2017 .

[15]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[17]  Mahdi Sharifzadeh,et al.  Inherently safe and economically optimal design using multi-objective optimization: the case of a refrigeration cycle , 2016 .

[18]  Murat Gunduz,et al.  Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. , 2013, Journal of safety research.

[19]  Lazim Abdullah,et al.  A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Jiwen An,et al.  Multi-criteria location model of earthquake evacuation shelters to aid in urban planning , 2016 .

[21]  Janko Hodolic,et al.  An Approach to Multi-criteria Environmental Evaluation with Multiple Weight Assignment , 2012, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[22]  J. Simos,et al.  Evaluer l"impact sur l"environnement , 1990 .

[23]  Sabrina Jocelyn,et al.  Design of a safety control system to improve the verification step in machinery lockout procedures: A case study , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Tim Horberry,et al.  Forklift safety, traffic engineering and intelligent transport systems: a case study. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A multigranular hierarchical linguistic model for design evaluation based on safety and cost analysis , 2005, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[26]  Daniel Friedrich,et al.  Assessment of standard compliance of Central European plastics-based wall cladding using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) , 2016 .

[27]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Dongping Fang,et al.  A comprehensive framework for assessing and selecting appropriate scaffolding based on analytic hierarchy process. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[29]  Ladislav Votruba,et al.  Analysis of water resource systems , 1988 .

[30]  François Gauthier,et al.  Development of a loading dock safety evaluation tool. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[31]  Chia-Ling Chang,et al.  A modified VIKOR method for multiple criteria analysis , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[32]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk-Based Inspection and Maintenance (RBIM): Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Aggregative Risk Analysis , 2004 .

[33]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  Xiao,et al.  MULTI-PRODUCT MULTI-PERIOD INVENTORY ROUTING OPTIMIZATION WITH TIME WINDOW CONSTRAINS , 2016 .