Long‐Term Structural Failure of Coaxial Polyurethane Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads

HAUSER, R.G., et al.: Long‐Term Structural Failure of Coaxial Polyurethane Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads. Transvene models 6936/6966, a coaxial polyurethane ICD lead, may be prone to structural failure. These models comprise 54% of ICD lead failures in the authors' Multicenter Registry database. Because ICD leads perform a vital function, the clinical features, causes, and probability of Transvene 6936/6966 lead failure were determined. The Registry and United States Food and Drug Administration databases were queried for the clinical features and structural causes of the Transvene 6936/6966 lead failure, and a five‐center substudy estimated the survival probability for 521 Transvene 6936/6966 implants. The mean time to failure was 4.8 ± 2.1 years, and the estimated survival at 60 and 84 months after implant were 92% and 84%, respectively. Oversensing was the most common sign of failure (76%), and 24 patients experienced inappropriate shocks. The manufacturer's reports indicated that high voltage coil fracture and 80A polyurethane defects were the predominant causes of lead failure. Transvene models 6936 and 6966 coaxial polyurethane ICD leads are prone to failure over time. Patients who have these leads should be evaluated frequently. Additional studies are needed to identify safe management strategies.

[1]  A. Buchwald,et al.  Early Detection of Lead Fracture by Painless High Voltage Lead Impedance Measurement in a Transvenous ICD Lead System , 2000, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[2]  V. Parsonnet,et al.  Unexpected ICD Pulse Generator Failure Due to Electronic Circuit Damage Caused by Electrical Overstress , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[3]  S. Chugh,et al.  Predictors and mode of detection of transvenous lead malfunction in implantable defibrillators. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Herre Advances in ICD Lead Technology , 2001 .

[5]  V Parsonnet,et al.  Feasibility and Initial Results of an Internet‐Based Pacemaker and ICD Pulse Generator and Lead Registry , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  B. Wilkoff,et al.  Lead- and device-related complications in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial. , 2001, American heart journal.

[7]  M. Keller,et al.  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Sensing lead-related complications in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Subclavian Crush Syndrome Complicating Transvenous Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  D. Hayes,et al.  A Multicenter Experience with a Bipolar Tined Polyurethane Ventricular Lead , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.