False Approximations of the Approximate Number System?

Prior research suggests that the acuity of the approximate number system (ANS) predicts future mathematical abilities. Modelling the development of the ANS might therefore allow monitoring of children's mathematical skills and instigate educational intervention if necessary. A major problem however, is that our knowledge of the development of the ANS is acquired using fundamentally different paradigms, namely detection in infants versus discrimination in children and adults. Here, we question whether such a comparison is justified, by testing the adult ANS with both a discrimination and a detection task. We show that adults perform markedly better in the discrimination compared to the detection task. Moreover, performance on discrimination but not detection, correlated with performance on mathematics. With a second similar experiment, in which the detection task was replaced by a same-different task, we show that the results of experiment 1 cannot be attributed to differences in chance level. As only task instruction differed, the discrimination and the detection task most likely reflect differences at the decisional level. Future studies intending to model the development of the ANS should therefore rely on data derived from a single paradigm for different age groups. The same-different task appears a viable candidate, due to its applicability across age groups.

[1]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[2]  Justin N Wood,et al.  Infants' enumeration of actions: numerical discrimination and its signature limits. , 2005, Developmental science.

[3]  N Ginsburg,et al.  Perceived Numerosity as a Function of Item Size , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  E. Spelke,et al.  Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[6]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Measuring the Approximate Number System , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[8]  T. Verguts,et al.  The origins of the numerical distance effect: The same–different task , 2011 .

[9]  A. L. Miller,et al.  The effects of shape, size, heterogeneity, and instructional set on the judgment of visual number. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  Fei Xu,et al.  Number sense in human infants. , 2005, Developmental science.

[12]  Hilary Barth,et al.  Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[15]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Relationships between magnitude representation, counting and memory in 4- to 7-year-old children: A developmental study , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[16]  Catherine Sophian,et al.  Measuring Spatial Factors in Comparative Judgments About Large Numerosities , 2007, HCI.

[17]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Behavioral and Neural Basis of Number Sense in Infancy , 2009, Current directions in psychological science.

[18]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Heterogeneity impairs numerical matching but not numerical ordering in preschool children. , 2007, Developmental science.

[19]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[20]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  The development of automatic numerosity processing in preschoolers: evidence for numerosity-perceptual interference. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[21]  Avishai Henik,et al.  The Brain Locus of Interaction between Number and Size: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-related Potential Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Distinct Cerebral Pathways for Object Identity and Number in Human Infants , 2008, PLoS biology.

[23]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[24]  Avishai Henik,et al.  When brightness counts: the neuronal correlate of numerical-luminance interference. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Tuning Curves for Approximate Numerosity in the Human Intraparietal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[26]  P. G. Vos,et al.  A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  M. Noël,et al.  Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing , 2007, Cognition.

[28]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Are numbers special? The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Sumarga H. Suanda,et al.  Temporal discrimination increases in precision over development and parallels the development of numerosity discrimination. , 2007, Developmental science.