Numerical Computation of Laminar Flow Pipeline Transport Axial Flow Field

The finite difference method is adopted to compute the axial velocity of coal water slurry (CWS) pipeline transport axial flow field flowing in the laminar flow, which could be described by Poisson partial differential equation. In this work, the finite difference method was used to compute the computational axial velocity. The axial velocity contour of CWS pipeline axial flow field was presented in the three-dimensional (3D) space, and the relationship curve between axial velocity and cross sectional diameter of CWS pipeline axial flow field was shown in a two-dimensional (2D) plane. The presentation results showed that the axial velocity of the CWS pipeline axial flow field increased from the boundary of the pipeline wall to the center of the CWS pipeline axial flow field, the increasing tendency between axial velocity and cross sectional diameter of the CWS pipeline axial flow field conformed to nonlinear relationship, furthermore, and the relationship curves between axial velocity and cross sectional diameter approximated the parabolic contour. Furthermore, the conclusions of the numerical computation of laminar flow pipeline transport axial flow field studied in the finite element method and finite difference method was compared.

[1]  Zhiqiang Xu,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Coal Water Mixture Pipeline Transport Axial Flow Field , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.

[2]  P. K. Senapati,et al.  Rheological Behavior of Coal-Water Slurry , 2002 .

[3]  C F Colebrook,et al.  TURBULENT FLOW IN PIPES, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE TRANSITION REGION BETWEEN THE SMOOTH AND ROUGH PIPE LAWS. , 1939 .

[4]  B. C. Meikap,et al.  Effect of microwave pretreatment of coal for improvement of rheological characteristics of coal-water slurries. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[5]  C. A. Shook,et al.  Pipeline transport of large ablating particles in a non-Newtonian carrier , 1997 .

[6]  G. Atesok,et al.  Effect of coal particle size distribution, volume fraction and rank on the rheology of coal–water slurries , 2004 .

[7]  Mihail C. Roco,et al.  Slurry flow : principles and practice , 1991 .

[8]  J. W. Hiby The Flow of Complex Mixtures in Pipes. Von G. W. Govier und K. Aziz. Van Nostrand Reinhold Comp., New York‐London 1972. 1. Aufl., XLVII, 792 S., zahlr. Abb., Ln. £ 17.65 , 1973 .

[9]  J. Ludden,et al.  Principles and Practice , 1998, Community-based Learning and Social Movements.

[10]  K. K. Mishra,et al.  High-concentration coal–water slurry from Indian coals using newly developed additives , 2004 .

[11]  R. Turian,et al.  Properties and rheology of coal–water mixtures using different coals , 2002 .

[12]  P. S. Cumber,et al.  Modelling outflow from a ruptured pipeline transporting compressed volatile liquids , 2003 .

[13]  Reda M. Bakeer,et al.  Fluid migration into lined pipelines , 2005 .

[14]  Yuji Tomita,et al.  Solids concentration profiles and pressure drop in pipeline flow of multisized particulate slurries , 2002 .

[15]  H. Usui A thixotropy model for coal-water mixtures , 1995 .

[16]  D Lee,et al.  Numerical simulation of flow fields in a tube with two branches. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.