Processing of stimulus properties: evidence for dual-task integrality.

The conditions under which dual-task integrality can be fostered were assessed in a study in which we manipulated four factors likely to influence the integrality between tasks: intertask redundancy, the spatial proximity of primary and secondary task displays, the degree to which primary and secondary task displays constitute a single object, and the resource demands of the two tasks. The resource allocation policy is inferred from changes in the amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential. Twelve subjects participated in three experimental sessions in which they performed both single and dual tasks. The primary task was a pursuit step tracking task. The secondary tasks required subjects to discriminate between different intensities or different spatial positions of a stimulus. Task pairs that required the processing of different properties of the same object resulted in better performance than task pairs that required the processing of different objects. Furthermore, these same object task pairs led to a positive relation between primary task difficulty and the resources allocated to secondary task stimuli. Intertask redundancy and the physical proximity of task displays produced similar effects of reduced magnitude.

[1]  E. Donchin,et al.  COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP , 1978 .

[2]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Effects of Participatory Mode and Task Workload on the Detection of Dynamic System Failures , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  P. Tueting,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in man , 1978 .

[4]  J S Lappin,et al.  Attention in the identification of stimuli in complex visual displays. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  G. Lockhead Effects of dimensional redundancy on visual discrimination. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  Grouping by proximity: Selective attention measures , 1975 .

[8]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[9]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. , 1979 .

[10]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[11]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Speed of discrimination with redundant stimulus attributes , 1969 .

[12]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The Stimulus in Information Processing , 1970 .

[13]  D. Trumbo,et al.  Secondary task interference in the performance of tracking tasks. , 1967 .

[14]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Time-Sharing Manual Control and Memory Search: The Joint Effects of Input and Output Modality Competition, Priorities and Control Order , 1981 .

[17]  Robert Arthur North Task Components and Demands as Factors in Dual-Task Performance. , 1977 .

[18]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Probing the Cognitive Infrastructure with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1982 .

[19]  Frank E. Gomer,et al.  Electrocortical Activity and Operator Workload: A Comparison of Changes in the Electroencephalogram and in Event-Related Potentials , 1981 .

[20]  E. Donchin,et al.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.

[21]  A. Treisman Focused attention in the perception and retrieval of multidimensional stimuli , 1977 .

[22]  C D Wickens,et al.  The Event-Related Brain Potential as an Index of Display-Monitoring Workload , 1980, Human factors.

[23]  Wt Singleton,et al.  Measurement of Man at Work , 1971 .

[24]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[26]  L. F. Alwitt,et al.  Two neural mechanisms related to modes of selective attention. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  C D Wickens,et al.  An Analysis of the Processing Requirements of a Complex Perceptual-Motor Task , 1983, Human factors.

[28]  P. Tueting,et al.  Brain and information: event-related potentials. , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information , 1984 .

[30]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing , 1970 .

[31]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  When words collide: Orthographic and phonological interference during word processing , 1983, Biological Psychology.

[32]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[33]  N Weisstein,et al.  Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority Effect , 1974, Science.

[34]  J. Requin Attention and Performance VII , 1980 .

[35]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[36]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. , 1983, Annual review of psychology.

[37]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Brain Electrical Correlates of Pattern Recognition , 1975 .

[38]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The effect of redundant stimulus elements on visual discrimination as a function of element heterogeneity, equal discriminability, and position uncertainty , 1969 .

[40]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  N. Moray Mental workload : its theory and measurement , 1979 .

[42]  D. Regan Evoked Potentials in Psychology, Sensory Physiology and Clinical Medicine , 1972 .

[43]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[44]  C D Wickens,et al.  Compatibility and Resource Competition between Modalities of Input, Central Processing, and Output , 1983, Human factors.

[45]  E Donchin,et al.  Averaged evoked potentials and intramodality selective attention. , 1967, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.