Partitioning of trace inorganic elements in a coal-fired power plant equipped with a wet Flue Gas Desulphurisation system

Abstract The abatement capacity of trace inorganic elements was studied in a large Pulverized Coal Combustion (PCC) power plant equipped with a wet limestone Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) system. High proportions of most elements were retained as fly ash as consequence of the efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator (ESP, 99.6% of fly ash) and slag (11%). The most volatile elements, such as S and F are retained by the FGD gypsum, and Cl by the filtered water; whereas the moderately volatile elements, As and B, are retained mainly by fly ash, reaching very high abatement efficiencies for these elements when considering the whole plant (>92%). Selenium and Hg are still retained by the whole system with relatively high proportions (89% and 67%); however a prominently proportion is emitted; Se (11%) and Hg (29%), attaining gaseous/PM rate at the emissions reaching 0.08 and 290, respectively. The gaseous emissions are below the limits according to the European directive 2001/80/EC for large combustion plants and the PRTR threshold values with the exception of Hg emissions and particulate Se, As, Zn, Cu, Ni, and Cr. Remediation actions to prevent and/or reduce the gaseous and PM emissions as well as the determination of leachable potential of trace inorganic pollutants retained in FGD gypsum, especially F in view of its disposal, are of significant relevance.

[1]  Nilgün Güleç,et al.  Assessment of soil and water contamination around an ash-disposal site: a case study from the Seyitömer coal-fired power plant in western Turkey , 2001 .

[2]  R. Meij,et al.  The Fate and Behavior of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Plants , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  X. Querol,et al.  Stabilization of FGD gypsum for its disposal in landfills using amorphous aluminium oxide as a fluoride retention additive. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[4]  V. Baligar,et al.  Benefits and constraints for use of FGD products on agricultural land , 2001 .

[5]  Ramesh Dayal,et al.  Characterization and leaching studies of FGD waste by-products , 1990 .

[6]  X. Querol,et al.  Study of the use of coal fly ash as an additive to minimise fluoride leaching from FGD gypsum for its disposal. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[7]  Ruud Meij,et al.  The emissions and environmental impact of PM10 and trace elements from a modern coal-fired power plant equipped with ESP and wet FGD , 2004 .

[8]  W. Voigt,et al.  Crystallization and Phase Stability of CaSO4 and CaSO4 – Based Salts , 2003 .

[9]  Ruud Meij,et al.  Trace element behavior in coal-fired power plants , 1994 .

[10]  X. Querol,et al.  Environmental impact of a coal combustion-desulphurisation plant: abatement capacity of desulphurisation process and environmental characterisation of combustion by-products. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[11]  Ruud Meij,et al.  Mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations: The current state of the art in the Netherlands. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Growth and Structure Refinement of CaSeO4×2 H2O. , 1991 .

[13]  D. Barišić,et al.  Radium and uranium in phosphate fertilizers and their impact on the radioactivity of waters , 1992 .

[14]  J. C. Ballesteros,et al.  Risk minimisation of FGD gypsum leachates by incorporation of aluminium sulphate. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  M. Maroto-Valer,et al.  Mercury speciation in gypsums produced from flue gas desulfurization by temperature programmed decomposition , 2010 .

[16]  L. Reijnders Disposal, uses and treatments of combustion ashes: a review , 2005 .

[17]  R. L. Lindbauer,et al.  Combustion dioxin supression in municipal solid waste incineration with sulphur additives , 1992 .

[18]  J. Fierro,et al.  Retention of arsenic and selenium compounds present in coal combustion and gasification flue gases using activated carbons , 2007 .

[19]  Brian K. Gullett,et al.  Role of Sulfur in Reducing PCDD and PCDF Formation , 1996 .

[20]  A. Tobías,et al.  Enrichment of inorganic trace pollutants in re-circulated water streams from a wet limestone flue ga , 2011 .

[21]  K. Hein,et al.  Prediction of trace element volatility during co-combustion processes , 2006 .

[22]  X. Querol,et al.  Trace elements in coal and their behaviour during combustion in a large power station , 1995 .

[23]  C. Cheeseman,et al.  Properties, microstructure and leaching of sintered sewage sludge ash , 2003 .

[24]  Oliver C. Mullins,et al.  Molecular size and weight of asphaltene and asphaltene solubility fractions from coals, crude oils and bitumen , 2006 .

[25]  D. Semmingsen,et al.  Neutron diffraction refinement of the structure of gypsum, CaSO4.2H2O , 1982 .

[26]  A study of trace element behaviour in two modern coal-fired power plants: II. Trace element balances in two plants equipped with semi-dry flue gas desulphurisation facilities , 1998 .

[27]  Takahisa Yokoyama,et al.  Emissions of mercury and other trace elements from coal-fired power plants in Japan. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  M. P. Ketris,et al.  Mercury in coal: a review: Part 1. Geochemistry , 2005 .

[29]  J. Alía,et al.  Miscibility in the CaSO4·2H2O–CaSeO4·2H2O system: Implications for the crystallisation and dehydration behaviour , 2006 .