Spider orb webs rely on radial threads to absorb prey kinetic energy

The kinetic energy of flying insect prey is a formidable challenge for orb-weaving spiders. These spiders construct two-dimensional, round webs from a combination of stiff, strong radial silk and highly elastic, glue-coated capture spirals. Orb webs must first stop the flight of insect prey and then retain those insects long enough to be subdued by the spiders. Consequently, spider silks rank among the toughest known biomaterials. The large number of silk threads composing a web suggests that aerodynamic dissipation may also play an important role in stopping prey. Here, we quantify energy dissipation in orb webs spun by diverse species of spiders using data derived from high-speed videos of web deformation under prey impact. By integrating video data with material testing of silks, we compare the relative contributions of radial silk, the capture spiral and aerodynamic dissipation. Radial silk dominated energy absorption in all webs, with the potential to account for approximately 100 per cent of the work of stopping prey in larger webs. The most generous estimates for the roles of capture spirals and aerodynamic dissipation show that they rarely contribute more than 30 per cent and 10 per cent of the total work of stopping prey, respectively, and then only for smaller orb webs. The reliance of spider orb webs upon internal energy absorption by radial threads for prey capture suggests that the material properties of the capture spirals are largely unconstrained by the selective pressures of stopping prey and can instead evolve freely in response to alternative functional constraints such as adhering to prey.

[1]  A. Summers,et al.  SPIDER DRAGLINE SILK: CORRELATED AND MOSAIC EVOLUTION IN HIGH-PERFORMANCE BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  C. Craig,et al.  The Significance of Spider Size to the Diversification of Spider-Web Architectures and Spider Reproductive Modes , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Structural engineering of an orb-spider's web , 1995, Nature.

[4]  M. S. Alam,et al.  Mechanics in naturally compliant structures , 2007 .

[5]  W. Nachtigall,et al.  Some aspects of Reynolds number effects in animals , 2001 .

[6]  B. Opell ESTIMATING THE STICKINESS OF INDIVIDUAL ADHESIVE CAPTURE THREADS IN SPIDER ORB WEBS , 2002 .

[7]  M. L. Hendricks,et al.  Adhesive recruitment by the viscous capture threads of araneoid orb-weaving spiders , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SPIDER'S SILK AND THEIR ROLE IN THE DESIGN OF ORB-WEBS , 1976 .

[9]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Quasistatic and continuous dynamic characterization of the mechanical properties of silk from the cobweb of the black widow spider Latrodectus hesperus , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  I. Agnarsson,et al.  Can a spider web be too sticky? Tensile mechanics constrains the evolution of capture spiral stickiness in orb‐weaving spiders , 2009 .

[11]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  The Form and Function of Spider Orb Webs: Evolution from Silk to Ecosystems , 2011 .

[12]  C. Craig,et al.  The ecological and evolutionary interdependence between web architecture and web silk spun by orb web weaving spiders , 1987 .

[13]  A. L. Turnbull ECOLOGY OF THE TRUE SPIDERS (ARANEOMORPHAE ) , 1973 .

[14]  S. Tang,et al.  Comparative study of the internal structures of Kevlar and spider silk by atomic force microscopy , 1994 .

[15]  Todd A. Blackledge,et al.  Viscoelastic solids explain spider web stickiness. , 2010, Nature communications.

[16]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Spider capture silk: performance implications of variation in an exceptional biomaterial. , 2007, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[17]  T. Blackledge,et al.  Mesh width influences prey retention in spider orb webs , 2006 .

[18]  J. Gosline,et al.  The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  Sean P Kelly,et al.  Damping capacity is evolutionarily conserved in the radial silk of orb-weaving spiders. , 2011, Zoology.

[20]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Nonlinear material behaviour of spider silk yields robust webs , 2012, Nature.

[21]  W. Nentwig The non-filter function of orb webs in spiders , 1983, Oecologia.

[22]  F. Ko,et al.  Modeling of mechanical properties and structural design of spider web. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[23]  F. Díaz‐Fleischer Predatory behaviour and prey-capture decision- making by the web-weaving spider Micrathena sagittata , 2005 .

[24]  D. Tritton,et al.  Physical Fluid Dynamics , 1977 .

[25]  R. Suter Ballooning in spiders: results of wind tunnel experiments , 1991 .

[26]  Jonathan A Coddington,et al.  Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Andrew T. Sensenig,et al.  Behavioural and biomaterial coevolution in spider orb webs , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[28]  Robert W. Work,et al.  The Force-Elongation Behavior of Web Fibers and Silks Forcibly Obtained from Orb-Web-Spinning Spiders , 1976 .

[29]  S. J. Kline,et al.  Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments , 1953 .

[30]  R. Foelix,et al.  The biology of spiders. , 1987 .

[31]  Ko Okumura,et al.  Simple model for the mechanics of spider webs. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[32]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata (Fabricius 1775) , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  B. Opell,et al.  Functional Similarities of Spider Webs with Diverse Architectures , 1996, The American Naturalist.