Spontaneous versus interaction-driven burstiness in human dynamics: The case of Wikipedia edit history.
暂无分享,去创建一个
The origin of non-Poissonian or bursty temporal patterns observed in various datasets for human social dynamics has been extensively studied, yet its understanding still remains incomplete. Considering the fact that humans are social beings, a fundamental question arises: Is the bursty human dynamics dominated by individual characteristics or by interaction between individuals? In this paper we address this question by analyzing the Wikipedia edit history to see how spontaneous individual editors are in initiating bursty periods of editing, i.e., spontaneous burstiness, and to what extent individual behaviors are driven by interaction with other editors in those periods, i.e., interaction-driven burstiness. We quantify the degree of initiative (DOI) of an editor of interest in each Wikipedia article by using the statistics of bursty periods containing the editor's edits. The integrated value of the DOI over all relevant timescales reveals which is dominant between spontaneous and interaction-driven burstiness. We empirically find that this value tends to be larger for weaker temporal correlations in the editor's editing behavior and/or stronger editorial correlations. These empirical findings are successfully confirmed by deriving an analytic form of the DOI from a model capturing the essential features of the edit sequence. Thus our approach provides a deeper insight into the origin and underlying mechanisms of bursts in human social dynamics.
[1] James P. Crutchfield,et al. An Algorithm for Pattern Discovery in Time Series , 2002, ArXiv.
[2] W. Marsden. I and J , 2012 .
[3] G. G. Stokes. "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[4] Naoki Masuda,et al. A Guide to Temporal Networks , 2016, Series on Complexity Science.
[5] J. Herskowitz,et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.