Competing constraints shape the nonequilibrium limits of cellular decision-making

Gene regulation is central to cellular function. Yet, despite decades of work, we lack quantitative models that can predict how transcriptional control emerges from molecular interactions at the gene locus. Thermodynamic models of transcription, which assume that gene circuits operate at equilibrium, have previously been employed with considerable success in the context of bacterial systems. However, the presence of ATP-dependent processes within the eukaryotic transcriptional cycle suggests that equilibrium models may be insufficient to capture how eukaryotic gene circuits sense and respond to input transcription factor concentrations. Here, we employ simple kinetic models of transcription to investigate how energy dissipation within the transcriptional cycle impacts the rate at which genes transmit information and drive cellular decisions. We find that biologically plausible levels of energy input can lead to significant gains in how rapidly gene loci transmit information, but discover that the regulatory mechanisms underlying these gains change depending on the level of interference from non-cognate activator binding. When interference is low, information is maximized by harnessing energy to push the sensitivity of the transcriptional response to input transcription factors beyond its equilibrium limits. Conversely, when interference is high, conditions favor genes that harness energy to increase transcriptional specificity by proofreading activator identity. Our analysis further reveals that equilibrium gene regulatory mechanisms break down as transcriptional interference increases, suggesting that energy dissipation may be indispensable in systems where non-cognate factor interference is sufficiently large.

[1]  Evan J. Olson,et al.  Systematic analysis of low-affinity transcription factor binding site clusters in vitro and in vivo establishes their functional relevance , 2021, Nature Communications.

[2]  Gavsper Tkavcik,et al.  Eukaryotic gene regulation at equilibrium, or non? , 2021, Current opinion in systems biology.

[3]  Yang Joon Kim,et al.  Predictive modeling reveals that higher-order cooperativity drives transcriptional repression in a synthetic developmental enhancer , 2021, bioRxiv.

[4]  Jiaxi Zhao,et al.  Minimal synthetic enhancers reveal control of the probability of transcriptional engagement and its timing by a morphogen gradient , 2021, bioRxiv.

[5]  Carl Wu,et al.  Single-molecule tracking of transcription protein dynamics in living cells: seeing is believing, but what are we seeing? , 2021, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  Jeremy Gunawardena,et al.  Allosteric conformational ensembles have unlimited capacity for integrating information , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  Magnus Rattray,et al.  Scalable inference of transcriptional kinetic parameters from MS2 time series data , 2020, bioRxiv.

[8]  G. Tkačik,et al.  Nonequilibrium models of optimal enhancer function , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  A matter of time: Using dynamics and theory to uncover mechanisms of transcriptional bursting. , 2020, Current opinion in cell biology.

[10]  Aleksandra M Walczak,et al.  A mechanism for hunchback promoters to readout morphogenetic positional information in less than a minute , 2020, eLife.

[11]  J. Gunawardena,et al.  Gene Regulation in and out of Equilibrium. , 2020, Annual review of biophysics.

[12]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Quantitative dissection of transcription in development yields evidence for transcription factor-driven chromatin accessibility , 2020, bioRxiv.

[13]  H. Boeger,et al.  Nucleosomal proofreading of activator–promoter interactions , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Multimodal transcriptional control of pattern formation in embryonic development , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Live‐cell imaging reveals the interplay between transcription factors, nucleosomes, and bursting , 2019, The EMBO journal.

[16]  J. Gunawardena,et al.  Negative reciprocity, not ordered assembly, underlies the interaction of Sox2 and Oct4 on DNA , 2019, eLife.

[17]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Figure 1 Theory Meets Figure 2 Experiments in the Study of Gene Expression. , 2018, Annual review of biophysics.

[18]  ChangHwan Lee,et al.  Dynamics of Notch-Dependent Transcriptional Bursting in its Native Context , 2018, bioRxiv.

[19]  Shawn C. Little,et al.  Diverse Spatial Expression Patterns Emerge from Unified Kinetics of Transcriptional Bursting , 2018, Cell.

[20]  J. Gunawardena,et al.  Dissecting the sharp response of a canonical developmental enhancer reveals multiple sources of cooperativity , 2018, bioRxiv.

[21]  D. Taatjes The Continuing SAGA of TFIID and RNA Polymerase II Transcription. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[22]  Polly M. Fordyce,et al.  Comprehensive, high-resolution binding energy landscapes reveal context dependencies of transcription factor binding , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Felix Naef,et al.  What shapes eukaryotic transcriptional bursting? , 2017, Molecular bioSystems.

[24]  Yuan He,et al.  Structural Insights into the Eukaryotic Transcription Initiation Machinery. , 2017, Annual review of biophysics.

[25]  Tae-Young Roh,et al.  RNA surveillance via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay is crucial for longevity in daf-2/insulin/IGF-1 mutant C. elegans , 2017, Nature Communications.

[26]  S. Ramsey,et al.  Identifying Cell Type-Specific Transcription Factors by Integrating ChIP-seq and eQTL Data–Application to Monocyte Gene Regulation , 2016, Gene regulation and systems biology.

[27]  R. Roeder,et al.  Mediator: A Drawbridge across the Enhancer-Promoter Divide. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[28]  Arunima Chaudhuri,et al.  Cell Biology by the Numbers , 2016, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[29]  Christophe Zimmer,et al.  A single-molecule view of transcription reveals convoys of RNA polymerases and multi-scale bursting , 2016, Nature Communications.

[30]  M. Levine,et al.  Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting , 2016, Cell.

[31]  Stephanie L. Johnson,et al.  Mechanisms of ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Motors. , 2016, Annual review of biophysics.

[32]  Huimin Chen,et al.  Transcription Dynamics in Living Cells. , 2016, Annual review of biophysics.

[33]  Jeremy Gunawardena,et al.  Information Integration and Energy Expenditure in Gene Regulation , 2016, Cell.

[34]  A. DePace,et al.  The appeasement of Doug: a synthetic approach to enhancer biology. , 2016, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[35]  Adam M Corrigan,et al.  A continuum model of transcriptional bursting , 2016, eLife.

[36]  R. Obst The Timing of T Cell Priming and Cycling , 2015, Front. Immunol..

[37]  Zeba Wunderlich,et al.  SiteOut: An Online Tool to Design Binding Site-Free DNA Sequences , 2015, bioRxiv.

[38]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Suboptimization of developmental enhancers , 2015, Science.

[39]  Gašper Tkačik,et al.  Intrinsic limits to gene regulation by global crosstalk , 2015, Nature Communications.

[40]  Heng Xu,et al.  COMBINING PROTEIN AND mRNA QUANTIFICATION TO DECIPHER TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION , 2015, Nature Methods.

[41]  Gašper Tkačik,et al.  Stochastic Proofreading Mechanism Alleviates Crosstalk in Transcriptional Regulation. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[42]  Hans V. Westerhoff,et al.  Multiplex Eukaryotic Transcription (In)activation: Timing, Bursting and Cycling of a Ratchet Clock Mechanism , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  P. Georgiev,et al.  Eukaryotic enhancers: common features, regulation, and participation in diseases , 2015, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[44]  R. Mann,et al.  Low Affinity Binding Site Clusters Confer Hox Specificity and Regulatory Robustness , 2015, Cell.

[45]  C. Gersbach,et al.  Engineering synthetic TALE and CRISPR/Cas9 transcription factors for regulating gene expression. , 2014, Methods.

[46]  Hernan G. Garcia,et al.  Dynamic regulation of eve stripe 2 expression reveals transcriptional bursts in living Drosophila embryos , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Thierry Mora,et al.  Thermodynamics of statistical inference by cells. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[48]  J. Elf,et al.  Direct measurement of transcription factor dissociation excludes a simple operator occupancy model for gene regulation , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[49]  J. Pérez-Ortín,et al.  Eukaryotic mRNA decay: methodologies, pathways, and links to other stages of gene expression. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  E. Siggia,et al.  Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Shawn C. Little,et al.  Precise Developmental Gene Expression Arises from Globally Stochastic Transcriptional Activity , 2013, Cell.

[52]  G. Tkačik,et al.  Noise and information transmission in promoters with multiple internal States. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[53]  A. Coulon,et al.  Eukaryotic transcriptional dynamics: from single molecules to cell populations , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[54]  D. Stern,et al.  TALE-mediated modulation of transcriptional enhancers , 2013, Nature Methods.

[55]  S. Eddy,et al.  Cell type–specific genomics of Drosophila neurons , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[56]  Stanislas Leibler,et al.  Speed, dissipation, and error in kinetic proofreading , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Charles J. Geyer,et al.  Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2011 .

[58]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Mediator and Cohesin Connect Gene Expression and Chromatin Architecture , 2010, Nature.

[59]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Genomic repertoires of DNA-binding transcription factors across the tree of life , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[60]  Nicolai Schipper Jespersen,et al.  An Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2010 .

[61]  L. Mirny Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  R. Kornberg The molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  W. Bialek,et al.  Probing the Limits to Positional Information , 2007, Cell.

[64]  S. Quake,et al.  A Systems Approach to Measuring the Binding Energy Landscapes of Transcription Factors , 2007, Science.

[65]  J. Lebowitz,et al.  A Gallavotti–Cohen-Type Symmetry in the Large Deviation Functional for Stochastic Dynamics , 1998, cond-mat/9811220.

[66]  Ming Yan,et al.  Multiple ATP‐dependent steps in RNA polymerase II promoter melting and initiation , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[67]  Ward Whitt,et al.  Asymptotic Formulas for Markov Processes with Applications to Simulation , 1992, Oper. Res..

[68]  T. L. Hill,et al.  Free Energy Transduction and Biochemical Cycle Kinetics , 1988, Springer New York.

[69]  B. Alberts,et al.  Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. , 1983, Journal of cell science.

[70]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[71]  J. Ninio Kinetic amplification of enzyme discrimination. , 1975, Biochimie.

[72]  J. Hopfield Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  B. K. Ghosh,et al.  Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses. , 1972 .

[74]  F. Massey The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit , 1951 .

[75]  J. Wolfowitz,et al.  Optimum Character of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test , 1948 .

[76]  Ewan Birney,et al.  Cell-type specific and combinatorial usage of diverse transcription factors revealed by genome-wide binding studies in multiple human cells. , 2012, Genome research.

[77]  E. Hubbard The C. elegans germ line: a model for stem cell biology , 2011 .

[78]  B. Alberts,et al.  Drosophila and the Molecular Genetics of Pattern Formation: Genesis of the Body Plan , 2002 .

[79]  Daniel T Gillesple,et al.  Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 2022 .