New cycle configuration to enhance performance of kinetic PSA processes

Abstract This work shows a new column arrangement to improve the utilization of the adsorbent in multi-column Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) processes. This cycle was specifically designed to increase the unit productivity for gas separations using adsorbents with slow diffusion kinetics where mass transfer zone (MTZ) inside the column is important. In this column arrangement, when the heavy (most adsorbed) gas breaks through one column, the exit of this column is connected to a second column (trim bed) where more heavy gas can be adsorbed. In this way, also more heavy gas will be adsorbed in the first (lead) column. The increase of process performance is directly related to the length of the MTZ: the larger the MTZ, the better will perform using the lead-trim beds concept. The cycle performance was tested for biogas upgrading to obtain high purity bio-methane (purity >98%) that can be used as renewable fuel. Two different adsorbents were employed in the process simulations: zeolites 13X (fast diffusion) and carbon molecular sieve (slow diffusion). Furthermore, the possibility of using less power in the purge step was considered. Using this process, it was possible to obtain unit productivity of 5.5 mol CH 4 per hour per kilogram of adsorbent.

[1]  Ronald W. Rousseau,et al.  Handbook Of Separation Process Technology , 2008 .

[2]  S. Farooq,et al.  Revisiting Transport of Gases in the Micropores of Carbon Molecular Sieves , 2003 .

[3]  Carlos A. Grande,et al.  Adsorption of small molecules on alkali-earth modified titanosilicates , 2009 .

[4]  Carlos A. Grande,et al.  Biogas to Fuel by Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption I. Behavior of Equilibrium and Kinetic-Based Adsorbents , 2007 .

[5]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  A General Package for the Simulation of Cyclic Adsorption Processes , 1999 .

[6]  K. Thomas,et al.  Kinetics of adsorption and diffusional characteristics of carbon molecular sieves , 1995 .

[7]  Carlos A. Grande,et al.  Upgrade of Methane from Landfill Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 2005 .

[8]  M. Douglas LeVan,et al.  Fundamentals of Adsorption , 1996 .

[9]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Propylene/propane separation by vacuum swing adsorption using 13X zeolite , 2001 .

[10]  M. Mitariten.  Economic N2 removal , 2004 .

[11]  K. Loughlin,et al.  Rate and equilibrium sorption parameters for nitrogen and methane on carbon molecular sieve , 1993 .

[12]  S. R. Auvil,et al.  Mass transfer in carbon molecular sieves—an interpretation of Langmuir kinetics , 1995 .

[13]  N. Wakao,et al.  Effect of fluid dispersion coefficients on particle-to-fluid heat transfer coefficients in packed beds , 1978 .

[14]  Christian Voss,et al.  Applications of Pressure Swing Adsorption Technology , 2005 .

[15]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures , 2004 .

[16]  K. S. Knaebel,et al.  Landfill Gas: From Rubbish to Resource , 2003 .

[17]  K. S. Knaebel,et al.  Pressure swing adsorption , 1993 .

[18]  K. Warmuziński.  Effect of pressure equalization on power requirements in PSA systems , 2002 .

[19]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Removal of Carbon Dioxide from Natural Gas by Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption , 2006 .

[20]  I. Karimi,et al.  Identification of Transport Mechanism in Adsorbent Micropores from Column Dynamics , 2002 .

[21]  Gilbert F. Froment,et al.  Heat transfer in packed beds , 1972 .

[22]  Shivaji Sircar,et al.  Pressure Swing Adsorption , 2002 .