The ‘Ecological’ Probability Density Function for Linear Optic Flow: Implications for Neurophysiology

A theoretical analysis of the recovery of shape from optic flow highlights the importance of the deformation components; however, pure deforming stimuli elicit few responses from flow-sensitive neurons in the medial superior temporal (MST) area of the cerebral cortex. This finding has prompted the conclusion that MST cells are not involved in shape recovery. However, this conclusion may be unjustified in view of the emerging consensus that MST cells perform nonlinear pattern matching, rather than linear projection as implicitly assumed in many neurophysiological studies. Artificial neural models suggest that the input probability density function (PDF) is crucial in determining the distribution of responses shown by pattern-matching cells. This paper therefore describes a Monte-Carlo study of the joint PDF for linear optic-flow components produced by ego-motion in a simulated planar environment. The recent search for deformation-selective cells in MST is then used to illustrate the importance of the input PDF in determining cell characteristics. The results are consistent with the finding that MST cells exhibit a continuum of responses to translation, rotation, and divergence. In addition, there are negative correlations between the deformation and conformal components of optic flow. Consequently, if cells responsible for shape analysis are present in the MST area, they should respond best to combinations of deformation with other first-order flow components, rather than to the pure stimuli used in previous neurophysiological studies.

[1]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Invariant Properties of the Motion Parallax Field due to the Movement of Rigid Bodies Relative to an Observer , 1975 .

[2]  John Porrill,et al.  The joint probability density function for linear optic flow components , 1998, Proceedings. Fourteenth International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98EX170).

[3]  A. Verri,et al.  Computational aspects of motion perception in natural and artificial vision systems. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Allan D. Jepson,et al.  Visual Perception of Three-Dimensional Motion , 1990, Neural Computation.

[6]  斎藤 秀昭,et al.  Integration of Direction Signals of Image Motion in the Superior Temporal Sulcus of the Macaque Monkey , 1987 .

[7]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  Tim S. Meese,et al.  On the relationship between deformation and perceived surface slant , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  田中 啓治 Analysis of Local and Wide-Field Movements in the Superior Temporal Visual Areas of the Macaque Monkey , 1987 .

[10]  Tim S. Meese,et al.  Speed gradients and the perception of surface slant: Analysis is two-dimensional not one-dimensional , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. II. Mechanisms of response selectivity revealed by small-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Orban,et al.  Responses of macaque STS neurons to optic flow components: a comparison of areas MT and MST. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  A. Verri,et al.  First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J A Perrone,et al.  Emulating the Visual Receptive-Field Properties of MST Neurons with a Template Model of Heading Estimation , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Graziano,et al.  Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  Ralph Linsker,et al.  How to Generate Ordered Maps by Maximizing the Mutual Information between Input and Output Signals , 1989, Neural Computation.

[19]  Y. Diao,et al.  Sensitivity of LS neurons to optic flow stimuli , 1997 .

[20]  J. Perrone,et al.  A model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex , 1994, Vision Research.

[21]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory, Second Edition , 1988, Springer Series in Information Sciences.

[22]  Tomaso A. Poggio,et al.  Regularization Theory and Neural Networks Architectures , 1995, Neural Computation.